I got question

  • Thread starter ludi_srbin
  • Start date
  • #1
137
0
In Friday we did simple lab in Physics. We took ball and dropped it measuring dropping height and rebound height. We did 10 trials and 10 times for every trial. We started from 100 cm and went all the way to 10 cm. Then we made a model y =0.75x+2 cm. Where x is dropping height in cm and y is rebound height, also, in cm. We could use this model to predict rebound height from any height. Well the accuracy wasn't really the priority. My question is if I "drop" the ball from height of zero cm I would get reboung height 2 cm, according to my model. How can that be?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
VietDao29
Homework Helper
1,423
2
Hmm, in fact, since the ball never has the rebound height that's greater than the height it was dropped from. So:
[tex]\frac{3}{4}x + 2 \leq x \Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{4}x \geq 2 \Leftrightarrow x \geq 8[/tex]
For any x < 8, it will return a false value.
So the formula can be true for x >= 8 cm. And that's why the smallest height in your work is 10cm, not 0 cm.
Viet Dao,
 
  • #3
LeonhardEuler
Gold Member
859
1
Apparantly either a linear model is no good for this situation, or your measurements were too imprecise or inaccurate.
 
  • #4
andrevdh
Homework Helper
2,128
116
Up to which point did you measure the heights of the ball? It's bottom, middle or top?
 

Related Threads on I got question

  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
824
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
787
Top