- #1

- 7

- 0

solve using power series:

(x^2)(y")+y=0

after solving it i stoped at :

an[n^2-n+1]=0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter momen salah
- Start date

- #1

- 7

- 0

solve using power series:

(x^2)(y")+y=0

after solving it i stoped at :

an[n^2-n+1]=0

- #2

- 119

- 0

- #3

- 1,250

- 2

Here is the general solution in terms of elementary functions:

[tex]

\sqrt{x} \cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{3} \log (x)\right) C_1+\sqrt{x}

\sin \left(\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{3} \log (x)\right) C_2

[/tex]

- #4

- 7

- 0

i don't know we only learned how to solve de's when there are no singularities

- #5

- 119

- 0

You can find more info with an example here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenius_method

- #6

- 7

- 0

how can i use this Frobenius method

- #7

uart

Science Advisor

- 2,776

- 9

how can i use this Frobenius method

It's quite an interesting problem, I just took the time to solve it now. Normally with a series solution you expect to find a recursion relation for the coefficients, but this one is quite different. Here, as I'm sure you've already discovered (and I'm guessing where you got stuck), there is no recursion relation and at first it may appear that all the coefficients are forced to zero.

If you apply the Frobenius method you should end up with something in the form of,

[tex] P(r+k) \, \, a_k = 0 [/tex], for each k, where P(.) is a polynomial.

No recursion relation, and all [tex]a_k[/tex] must be zero except for at most a finite number corresponding to the zeros of P(.).

If you got this far and it all seemed wrong then don't depair, you're on the right track. Here are some hints to finish it off.

1. Let [tex]r + k = \omega [/tex] (or whatever) and solve [tex]P(\omega) = 0 [/tex]

2. If you get complex roots then keep going regardless. (Don't worry as later in the solution you can still restrict the remaining coefficients to force y to be a real function).

3. Don't forget that the complex exponential [tex]x^{i \beta}[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex] e^{i \beta \log(x)} [/tex].

Follows those hints and you'll get Crosson's solution with surprisingly little effort.

Last edited:

- #8

- 64

- 0

- #9

uart

Science Advisor

- 2,776

- 9

- #10

- 64

- 0

Alright, thanks!

Share:

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 5K