- #1
- 106
- 0
I read in a magazine......
That a universe with 1 dimension of time and 2 dimensions would be too simple for life.
Why?
That a universe with 1 dimension of time and 2 dimensions would be too simple for life.
Why?
Since PF strives to maintain a higher standard of discussion than most open forums, it is imperative that when you decide to ask a question or clarification based on another external source (such as a magazine), that you make an accurate citation of that source, i.e. name of the magazine, the date/volume number, page number, name of author of that article, etc. If not, there is no way for any of us to double check on what you read, if you misinterpret the source, or if the source is even credible at all.Blahness said:That a universe with 1 dimension of time and 2 dimensions would be too simple for life.
Why?
Not so, leptons and quarks are treated (approximated) as 0 dimensional point particles.Danger said:We've all been avoiding the fundamental fact that atoms and the components thereof, plus leptons and bosuns, are 3D, so I think that pretty much rules out anything existing in Flatland.