Interpreting SPI Commands in FPGA Applications

  • Thread starter unplebeian
  • Start date
In summary, SPI is a communication protocol used between devices. It involves four wires: MOSI, MISO, CS/SS, and CLK. The master device sends data to the slave device through MOSI, and the slave device echoes the data back through MISO. The data is then loaded into a shift register, where it can be used for logic or sent to a processor. The HDL code for this involves an always statement that is sensitive to the clock, and an if statement to check if the chip select is satisfied. Depending on the application, the data can be used to change register values, start other processes, or shut down the system. Examples of SPI in use can be found in various products and online resources.
  • #1
unplebeian
157
1
TL;DR Summary
How does an I2C/SPI command write to an FPGA gets executed?
Hi folks,

Can someone explain to me how an FPGA executes an I2C/SPI/other command written to it. I understand that there is an I2C_RX or a SPI_RX module that acts as a slave and can get the transmitted data. But shouldn't there be another interpreter that deciphers the data and takes action on it such as change the contents of another register etc.

How is this interpretation done/written in FPGA? Can someone give me an example.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'll talk about SPI because I think it's more slightly more simple compared to I2C.

The most straightforward SPI has four wires: master out slave in (MOSI), master in slave out (MISO), chip select or slave select (CS or SS), and a clock (CLK). It can have multiple CS for multiple slave devices; I've also seen some variants of it including a latch data.

Chip select (CS) triggers first telling the chip that it's going to receive something. The data from master device comes into the slave device (MOSI) and the slave device echos what it is receiving (MISO). This is just a bunch of high or low voltages (1's or 0's), and it's loaded or clocked into a shift register. Once the shift register is full it has a bunch of 1's and 0's that can be used in later digital logic (NOT, NOR, NAND's, flip-flip, etc.) or can even go into a processor.

The HDL if you were looking at something like Verilog would make the always statement sensitive to the clock- do something when the clock is a positive or negative edge, or both. The first condition would be an if statement (equivalent to a multiplexer MUX) that would check if the chip select is satisfied. If the chip select is satisfied, then load the input value (MOSI) into registers for so many clock cycles; echo whatever is loaded into to the registers to the output (MISO). When it's all done you have a loaded register that you can use for logic.

I was going to write a SPI in verilog, but I see there are lots of examples found through a search engine. As for the FPGA itself a lot of the products I've seen you can write a SPI with C programming and a SPI command might be as simple one or two liner like transfer(data) or writeRead(data). MATLAB has some examples (here's where I looked).
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #3
Hi Joshy,

I understand the protocol itself but I am still uncertain about what the next step is. I understand that the FPGA can capture the MOSI data on the clock edge (depending on the SPI mode). Let me give you an example.

Let's say we want to write the data from reg 0x5 using the SPI protocol. The FPGA receives a SPI command to do just that and stores the MISO data in some reg. But what happens next. How do we distinguish what to do next based on the MISO command - to either change a reg value or start execution of some other process or shut down the system etc.

I need an example of how this is coded or at least some more depth.
 
  • #4
  • #5
unplebeian said:
I understand the protocol itself but I am still uncertain about what the next step is. I understand that the FPGA can capture the MOSI data on the clock edge (depending on the SPI mode).
What is in the FPGA? What it does with the data depends on what configuration has been loaded. FPGAs are "field programmable", after all, so what program has been loaded?

We use FPGAs for all kinds of things at my work. In some of our circuits where we are using large FPGAs to emulate new microcontrollers (uCs), they are the SPI / I2C master, for example. It looks just like a uC like a PIC or similar.

In other circuits we use FPGAs in embedded control devices. In those cases the SPI link to the FPGA is used to set IO configurations and read back sensor data.
 
  • #6
unplebeian said:
Hi Joshy,

I understand the protocol itself but I am still uncertain about what the next step is. I understand that the FPGA can capture the MOSI data on the clock edge (depending on the SPI mode). Let me give you an example.

Let's say we want to write the data from reg 0x5 using the SPI protocol. The FPGA receives a SPI command to do just that and stores the MISO data in some reg. But what happens next. How do we distinguish what to do next based on the MISO command - to either change a reg value or start execution of some other process or shut down the system etc.

I need an example of how this is coded or at least some more depth.

SPI is an interface, which is to say it is basically a communication protocol between devices.

What you describe above is the act of communicating, your FPGA has initiated a command over SPI, and the device has responded with some data (in reg 0x5 in your example). As far as understanding SPI itself, that's it, SPI has done its job once you have the data in your register.

Now what to do with that data is determined by the application, ie why are these two devices connected with SPI in the first place?

You might have your FPGA connected to an SPI temperature sensor. Your FPGA pings it, gets some numbers back. You connected your FPGA to a temperature sensor, therefore, you know the number that you get is a temperature, and you had to have had a reason to make this connection in the first place! Maybe your FPGA reads that number, checks against a limit, and if that limit is exceeded it maybe turns off a heater, for example.

Basically none of these things exist in a vacuum, they are solutions to a problem, SPI solves the inter-device communication problem, what you do with that inter-device communication capability is entirely up to you, the designer of an application.
 

What is I2C/SPI command interpretation?

I2C/SPI command interpretation is the process of converting high-level commands into a format that can be understood by I2C/SPI communication protocols. These protocols are commonly used for communication between microcontrollers and peripheral devices.

What is the difference between I2C and SPI communication?

I2C (Inter-Integrated Circuit) and SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) are two different communication protocols used for connecting microcontrollers to peripheral devices. The main difference between them is the number of wires required for communication - I2C uses two wires (data and clock) while SPI uses four wires (data in, data out, clock, and chip select).

How do I interpret an I2C/SPI command?

To interpret an I2C/SPI command, you will need to follow the specific protocol's guidelines for data format and timing. This typically involves sending a start signal, followed by the device address, the command, and any necessary data. The device will then respond with an acknowledgement or data, depending on the command.

What are some common applications of I2C/SPI communication?

I2C/SPI communication is commonly used in applications where multiple devices need to communicate with a microcontroller, such as in sensor networks, display drivers, and memory chips. It is also used in many consumer electronics, such as smartphones, cameras, and smart home devices.

What are the advantages of using I2C/SPI communication?

I2C/SPI communication offers several advantages, including simplicity, low cost, and low power consumption. It also allows for multiple devices to be connected to a single bus, reducing the number of wires needed. Additionally, I2C/SPI communication can achieve higher speeds compared to other communication protocols, making it suitable for time-sensitive applications.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
880
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
861
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
662
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Biology and Medical
3
Replies
100
Views
6K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
34
Views
4K
Back
Top