- #36
negation
- 818
- 0
Chestermiller said:Your intuition was correct. 2.4 + 3.3 = 5.7
The angle is zero.
check post#34, something could be wrong
Chestermiller said:Your intuition was correct. 2.4 + 3.3 = 5.7
The angle is zero.
No way. It's definitely zero.negation said:check post#34, something could be wrong
Chestermiller said:No way. It's definitely zero.
(2.4 + 3.3 cosθ)2+(3.3sinθ)2=5.72
(5.76+ 10.89cos2θ+15.84cosθ)+10.89sin2θ)=32.49
5.76+10.89(cos2θ+sin2θ)+15.84cosθ=32.49
5.76+10.89 +15.84 cosθ = 32.49
15.84 cosθ = 15.84
cosθ = 1
θ = 0
Chestermiller said:No way. It's definitely zero.
(2.4 + 3.3 cosθ)2+(3.3sinθ)2=5.72
(5.76+ 10.89cos2θ+15.84cosθ)+10.89sin2θ)=32.49
5.76+10.89(cos2θ+sin2θ)+15.84cosθ=32.49
5.76+10.89 +15.84 cosθ = 32.49
15.84 cosθ = 15.84
cosθ = 1
θ = 0
Yes, as long as it's considered schematic. But, in the actual case with θ=0, the triangle is going to be degenerate.negation said:Would I be right in sketching
On the x-axis Vx=3.3cos(theta) +2.4
And
On the y-axis Vy=3.3sin(theta)
With the hypothenus being 5.7?
Chestermiller said:The above is not done correctly. Sorry. θ is not a function of t, so sinθ and cosθ factor out of the integral.
If you integrate those equations, it goes like this:
[tex]v_x(3)-v_x(0)=\int_0^3{1.1\cosθdt}=1.1\cosθ\int_0^3{dt}=3.3\cosθ[/tex]
or
[tex]v_x(3)=2.4+3.3\cosθ[/tex]
Similarly,
[tex]v_y(3)=3.3\sinθ[/tex]
Only if you integrate with respect to x. If you integrate with respect to something unrelated to x, x staying constant, then cos(x) is a constant. Why should it change to sin(x)?negation said:Strange.
If one integrates 1.1cos(x) shouldn't one obtain 1.1sin(x)?