One of my books defines a relation which is "evidently" an equivalence relation. It says that two idempotents in a ring P and Q are said to be equivalent if there exist elements X and Y such that P = XY and Q = YX.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The proof that this relation is transitive eludes me. There is so little information, that I feel like this has to have a really short proof, but I just can't seem to figure it out (or find it on the magical internet). If anyone can can ease my frustration, I would be grateful.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Idempotent Equivalence in Rings

Loading...

Similar Threads - Idempotent Equivalence Rings | Date |
---|---|

I What is the equivalent of a group in category theory? | Nov 7, 2017 |

I Are the columns space and row space same for idempotent matrix? | Sep 3, 2016 |

Show a ring is idempotent 2 | Feb 21, 2011 |

Idempotent matrix | Feb 17, 2011 |

What are Idempotents? | May 4, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**