1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Identical discharging spheres

  1. Oct 6, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data


    Two identical small metal spheres initially carry charges q_1 and q_2. When they're x=1.0m apart, they experience a 2.5N attractive force. Then they're brought together so charge moves from one to the other until they have the same net charge. They're again placed x=1.0m apart, and now they repel with a 2.5N force.

    2. Relevant equations

    F=kq1q2/r^2

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Alright, so this question seemed pretty easy but my answer isn't making any sense. First I solved for the net charge on the spheres after they had discharged,

    F=kq3^2/r^2 ... q3=sqrt(Fr^2/k) = 1.667*10^-5C

    Next I assumed that since the two spheres had balanced their charges, the original charges were 1.667*10^-5 +/- x.

    Putting this back into the Coulomb's Law equation I got

    F=k(1.667*10^-5 - x)(1.667*10^-5 + x)/r^2

    But when I solved for x and then tried to sub it back in to q1=(1.667*10^-5 - x) and q2=(1.667*10^-5 + x), both q1 and q2 were positive, which would not result in an attractive force.

    Help please. =)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 6, 2009 #2

    rl.bhat

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Hi Tridius. welcome to PF.
    In the first case, F = k*q1*q2/d^2.
    In the second case, charge on each sphere is (q1 - q2)/2
    So F= k*(q1 - q2)^2/d^2
    Can you proceed now?
     
  4. Oct 6, 2009 #3
    Thanks a lot, this should really help. What I don't understand though is that if the charges are now (q1-q2)/2, then why is the force k(q1-q2)^2/d^2? Where did the 2 in the denominator go?
     
  5. Oct 6, 2009 #4

    rl.bhat

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    The force should be
    F = k(q1-q2)^2/4*d^2
     
  6. Oct 6, 2009 #5

    Delphi51

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    I don't understand why each charge is (q1-q2)/2.
    If it was, then the total charge would be 2*(q1-q2)/2 = q1-q2.
    But we know the total charge is q1 + q2.
    Looks like the charge on each must be (q1 + q2)/2.
     
  7. Oct 6, 2009 #6

    rl.bhat

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Since the force is attractive, the charges must be of opposite nature.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Identical discharging spheres
Loading...