Rade said:I guess I need to ask, do you hold that A = non-A is an axiom of your philosophic thinking ?
Actually, I do think a thing can often be the same as its opposite. I believe the universe is fundamentally ambiguous, so the best way to think about it is to allow for some ambiguity. I would perhaps agree that the less ambiguity, the better, but I wouldn't refrain from exploring an idea simply because I can't express it in formal logic.
I suppose that attitude is called "mysticism", but I'm not sure.