Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

If GP1 fails to favour GR

  1. Jan 12, 2008 #1

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    If this mammoth effort does favour some other model what will the next step be?

    Will every one try to find fault first?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 12, 2008 #2

    Garth

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    wolram, what is GP1? :confused:

    Garth
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2008
  4. Jan 12, 2008 #3

    turbo

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I think we can safely assume he means Gravity Probe B, and it is a pretty probing question.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2008
  5. Jan 12, 2008 #4

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Sorry it is obvious i get things mixed up, i did mean GPB.
     
  6. Jan 12, 2008 #5

    Garth

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    First it is obvious that there will be room for dispute in the GP-B results. The unexpected errors are being modelled and subtracted from the data to give the signal, however I see that if the final result is inconsistent with GR to greater than a 3 [itex]\sigma[/itex] confidence level then plenty of people will question their error models.

    It is interesting to see that the present results are inconsistent with GR to a 1 [itex]\sigma[/itex] confidence level as discussed here.

    If the results prove to be inconsistent with GR and consistent with another theory then it will depend on the plausibility of that other theory, but I see a lot of momentum in the standard model so that it will require time to 'turn the ship around'.

    Garth
     
  7. Jan 12, 2008 #6

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Garth, i imagine that the heavens will fall down if GPB favours some model other than GR
    I just need to know how much wiggle room there is, could the debate make the test a
    nonsense?
     
  8. Jan 12, 2008 #7

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    After looking in the arxives i guess , CL means anything is possible, i mean if one takes all the above 95% CLs , to mean some thing.
     
  9. Jan 13, 2008 #8

    Garth

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The GP-B team claim that eventually (May 08) they will be able to reduce the error bars to within 1 mas to, I presume, the 3 [itex]\sigma[/itex] CL.

    All the data and their error reduction modelling will be posted by NASA on the internet for anyone else to check.

    Just a reminder, the present 1 [itex]\sigma[/itex] result represents an inconsistency with GR at the 68% confidence level.

    Garth
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2008
  10. Jan 13, 2008 #9

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Thank you Garth, if this CL is reached what will the next step be?
     
  11. Jan 15, 2008 #10

    Garth

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    To see whether it is consistent with GR, or otherwise.

    If inconsistent the next step will be to check and double check everything and see whether the confirmed results lead to a modified GR, or otherwise.

    Wait and see, not long now (I hope). :rolleyes:

    Garth
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?