If I don't solve these two problems, I'm gonna lose $60

  • Thread starter alexgott_iscool
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation revolves around a problem involving a parallel plate capacitor and the determination of induced charge density on a silver dollar placed between the plates. The concept of electric field magnitude and Gauss's Law are discussed, as well as the use of formulas to solve the problem. It is suggested that solving the problem without knowledge of these concepts would be difficult.
  • #1
alexgott_iscool
2
0
Here is the first one, dealing with parallel plate capacitors. I'm just stuck on these, if anyone could give me a push in the right direction at least that would be nice.
#1

The Magnitude of the electric field between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor is 480 N/C. A silver dollar is placed between the plates and oriented parallel to the plates. Ignoring the edges, find the induced charge density on each face of the coin.

All I know is that the charge density = q/Area, and that the only other thing mentioned is the electric field magnitude. I just need some help understanding it.

#2
You know what, I'll do number two later.

Thanks to anybody that can help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Think of what Gauss's Law states. Net flux through a closed surface equals charge enclosed divided by epsilon nought.

[tex] \oint \vec{E} \cdot \vec{dA} = \frac{Q_{encl}}{\epsilon_0} [/tex]

Pick your gaussian surface to be box with faces parralel to the coin. let one of the faces lie inside the coin (between coins faces) and the other to lie between the coin and one of the plates.

What is the electric field inside a conductor (the coin)?


P.S. For my share, I'll only take %30 of the $$ :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #3
The only problem with that is that this is from the section before Gauss' law. I think it's supposed to be a somewhat straightforward problem.
 
  • #4
Do you know [itex] E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} [/itex]?
 
  • #5
This is a straight forward problem, but it is a direct result of gauss' law. Any argument you give for the answer will in some way use his result, although you may not know it yet. For example: Perhaps your book makes the claim that the electric field within a conductor is zero, but how do you know this. If it hasn't been shown yet, it will be shown as a result from gauss's law.
 
  • #6
vincentchan said:
Do you know [itex] E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} [/itex]?
I can't imagine that they would give that formula without first going through Gauss' Law. I mean how do they expect you to understand what it means :confused:
 
  • #7
I just realized... in the very beginning they usually show you that the electric field inside a conductor is zero because if it weren't, then the charges would fell a force and thus would not be in static equillibrium. So with this in mind, how much charge is required to be on the edges of the coin so the electric field is zero?

think of the superposition principle of the electric field. It might help to view the coin as a small parrallel plate capacitor
 
  • #8
solving this problem without gauss law is a mess... do you expect his teacher/textbook will ask him to do this problem without providing neither my formulas nor gauss law? I don't think so... I believe this formulas must be somewhere in his textbook, he just doesn't know how/when to apply it...
 
  • #9
how much charge is required to be on the edges of the coin so the electric field is zero?
BTW, you still need either my formulas or gauss' law to do this... use coulomb law doing this problem is just far too complicated...
 
  • #10
I totally agree (as per my earlier posts) this is a classic Gauss's Law problem. I was thinking that he could use the equation for the E of a capacitor, but I just noticed in the OP that they did not give the dimensions of the coin, so your formula would be required.
 
Last edited:

1. How can I solve these two problems?

To solve these two problems, it is important to first identify the root causes of the issues. Then, you can develop a plan of action to address each problem individually. Consider seeking advice from colleagues or conducting research to find potential solutions.

2. What happens if I don't solve these problems?

If these problems are not solved, there is a high likelihood that you will lose $60. It is important to address and solve these problems in a timely manner to prevent any further consequences.

3. How much time do I have to solve these problems?

The amount of time you have to solve these problems may vary depending on the severity and complexity of the issues. It is important to start addressing them as soon as possible to prevent any potential losses.

4. Can I seek help from others to solve these problems?

Yes, seeking help from colleagues, experts, or conducting research are all viable options to help solve these problems. Collaboration and seeking advice can often lead to more effective and efficient solutions.

5. How can I prevent these types of problems from occurring in the future?

To prevent similar problems from occurring in the future, it is important to analyze and learn from the current situation. Identify any weaknesses or gaps in your processes and implement improvements to prevent similar issues from arising in the future.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
394
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
580
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
316
Replies
4
Views
360
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
667
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top