Light & Lead: Wave Particles Compression?

In summary, the interaction between light and matter is not based on the density of the material, but rather on the composition and electronic structure of the atoms in the material. Light does not see objects as solid blocks, but rather as electron shells, and its behavior is determined by the absorption and reemission of photons by these electron shells. The perception of light and color is a result of the interaction between light and the electronic structure of our eyes and the objects around us.
  • #1
whatzzupboy
60
0
:uhh: If light is a wave of photonic particles wouldn't that mean that when light hit a bolck of lead that it would compress and ultimatly nutalize it self? Due to the fact, that lead is extremely dense, so eventualy if a wave of photonic particles came incontact lead at a 180* angle that it they would eventually come into contact with some molocule and all the photonic wave particles would all bounce back and colide into the on coming photonic waves? :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm an engineering major so this isn't my forte and maybe my reasoning is wrong but here are my opinions on the questions you posed. This might have been a more apt question for the physics or even chemistry forums:

If I got your question right, "if light is a wave" shouldn't photons interfere with themselves if two happened to collide? I could hardly explain why it happens in the double-slit experiment but yeah light does "neutralize" itself I guess when certain conditions are met like in the experiment mentioned above, but simply shining 2 lights at each other won't cause a lot if any visible destructive interference.

...light hit a bolck of lead that it would compress and ultimatly nutalize it self? Due to the fact, that lead is extremely dense...

Diamond is much more dense than lead. I think that absorption of the light depends more on the chemical makeup of the molecules inside the substance.

so eventualy if a wave of photonic particles came incontact lead at a 180* angle that it they would eventually come into contact with some molocule and all the photonic wave particles would all bounce back and colide into the on coming photonic waves?

Did you mean normal to the lead? (90 degrees). As far as I know, there are no macroscopic effets of light bouncing back through itself, although I've seen calculations of photon-photon collisions that appear to change the energy (and therefore color) of both. Even in substances that have the property of being transparent/translucent, photons don't miraculously go through without being touched: They're constantly being absorbed and re-emitted by molecules as they pass through.

I'll leave it to one of the many physics gurus on this board to 1. fill in the gaps of my explanations and/or 2. tell me I'm completely wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
vsage said:
Diamond is much more dense than lead.


I believe any engineer ought to know better... :wink: The mass volumic density of lead is roughly 11900Kg m^{-3},while for diamond approx.3500Kg m^{-3}... :rolleyes:





vsage said:
tell me I'm completely wrong.

No...Just look again in the density table...If you didn't do it while studying engineering.:wink:

Daniel.
 
  • #4
Alright I guess I was wrong, but maybe I should mention although I'm an engineering major I haven't actually taken any engineering courses yet (1st yr) but I suppose I shouldn't have spoken like I knew what I was talking about. I guess my argument holds just my example was crap. Thanks for pointing that out dextercioby :)
 
  • #5
I still don't understan why, if light is waves why doesn't it do the following
1)
______
Lead |
Box | <<</\/\/\/\/\/\(Light waves)/\/\/\/\
_____|

2)
______
Lead |
Box | /\/\/\(Light)/\/\/\/>>>||||<<<</\/\/\(Waves)/\/\/\/\/\/\<
_____|

||||=The two wave coliding into on another causng the wave to nutralize it's self by it's deflected(refleced Counter part)

And wouldn't that say a mirror is more dense than lead (FYI: I know a mirror isn't) since it reflects the light waves exactly the same?

If not, or if so, why?
 
  • #6
"Light" ,that is EM radiation in the visible range. does not "see" lead it sees electron shells. When a photon encounters the electron shell of an atom it is either adsorbed or passes on by. Clearly, because we cannot see through it, the lead atom adsorbs photons of the visible spectrum. Once a photon is adsorbed, after a short delay, there is a photon reemtted. The frequency (color) of this photon may, or may not be the same as the adsorbed photon. The color of lead (or any material) is determined by the reemitted photons.

The fundamental problem with your analysis is assuming that photons of light see lead as a solid block. They do not, they see electron shells and have no idea what a solid is.
 
  • #7
then how is it that they interact with our eyes so that we "see" light and everything wraped in it if they do not see any particles as solids?
 
  • #8
whatzzupboy said:
then how is it that they interact with our eyes so that we "see" light and everything wraped in it if they do not see any particles as solids?
They interact with the electrons in the atomic structure of your eyes. Your nervous system has developed to react to these electronic transions. Just like they do with ALL material objects.
 

1. What is the concept behind "Light & Lead: Wave Particles Compression"?

The concept behind "Light & Lead: Wave Particles Compression" is the idea that light and lead particles can be compressed in a specific way to create a new form of energy that can be harnessed and used for various purposes. This concept is based on the principles of wave-particle duality, which suggests that light and matter can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior.

2. How does the compression of light and lead particles work?

The compression of light and lead particles is achieved through the use of specialized equipment that can manipulate the particles in a controlled environment. This process involves focusing and concentrating the particles in a specific area, which causes them to interact and merge, creating a new form of energy.

3. What are the potential applications of "Light & Lead: Wave Particles Compression"?

There are many potential applications of "Light & Lead: Wave Particles Compression" including energy production, medical treatments, and advanced technologies. The compressed particles can be used to generate electricity, power engines, and even be used in medical procedures such as cancer treatment. This technology also has the potential to revolutionize the way we communicate and process information.

4. Are there any risks associated with "Light & Lead: Wave Particles Compression"?

As with any new technology, there are potential risks associated with "Light & Lead: Wave Particles Compression." One of the main concerns is the potential for the release of harmful radiation during the compression process. However, scientists are working to minimize these risks and ensure the safety of this technology.

5. How does "Light & Lead: Wave Particles Compression" differ from other forms of energy production?

Unlike traditional forms of energy production such as fossil fuels or nuclear power, "Light & Lead: Wave Particles Compression" is a clean and renewable energy source. It does not produce harmful emissions or waste, making it a more sustainable option for the future. It also has the potential to be more efficient and cost-effective than other forms of energy production.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
724
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Back
Top