1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

If this is Gaussian beam?

  1. Jan 16, 2010 #1


    User Avatar

    In the book "Fundamentals of Photonics", the form of the Gaussian beam is written as
    [tex]I(\rho,z) = I_0 \left(\frac{W_0}{W(z)}\right)^2\exp\left[-\frac{2\rho^2}{W^2(z)}\right][/tex]
    where [tex]\rho = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}[/tex]

    However, in some books (I forgot which one), the author use the following form
    [tex]I(R) = I_0 \exp\left[-\frac{R^2W_0^2}{W^2}\right][/tex]
    [tex]R = \rho/W_0, \qquad \rho=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/tex]

    In the second expression, I don't know why there is no [tex]\left(W_0/W(z)\right)^2[/tex] in the amplitude and why he want to define R instead of using [tex]\rho[/tex] directly? And what about [tex]W_0[/tex] and [tex]W[/tex] in the second expression? Are they have some meaning as in the first one?

    I forgot which book using such form, if you know any information, could you please tell me the title and author of the book? Thanks.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 17, 2010 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Off hand (I'll admit I know nothing about the physics involved) it looks like the two expressions are equivalent, except for the 2 in the numerator of the first expression. W and W0 look like they are the same in both. The coeficient of both is I0. In one case the argument seems to be expressed, while the other may be implicit - again I don't know what any of this is supposed to be physically.
  4. Jan 17, 2010 #3


    User Avatar

    Thanks. I am thinking one aspect on physics. Since the energy is conserved (the total energy of the input beam should be conserved after transported to some distance), so if the intensity is not inverse proportional to the waist, how to make the energy conserved? Please show me if I am wrong :)
  5. Jan 18, 2010 #4
    I would first write the cross section of the beam traveling in the z direction in cartesian coordinates:

    I(z) = I0 exp[-x2/2σx(z)2] exp[-y2/2σy(z)2]

    where σx(z) and σy(z) are the rms widths of the Gaussian beam in the x and y directions at z.

    This may be rewritten as

    I(z) = I0 exp[-x2/2σx(z)2-y2/2σy(z)2]

    and finally as

    I(z) = I0 exp[-ρ2/2σ(z)2]

    if σx(z) = σy(z), where ρ2 = x2 + y2.

    Bob S
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Gaussian beam Date
I Effect of Collimated lens on Gauss Beam May 10, 2016
Is starlight a TEM00 gaussian beam or plane wave? Jan 16, 2016
Gaussian Beam Focusing Dec 9, 2015
Gaussian Beam Parameter Oct 13, 2011