If x is an accumulation point of set S and e >0

Main Question or Discussion Point

If I were proving that "if x is an accumulation point of set S and e >0, then there are infinite number of points within e of x", is it exactly the same as saying "if x is a limit point of set S, then every neighborhood of x contains infinitely many points of S"?
 

Answers and Replies

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
Seems so to me.
 
92
0
Well, a "limit point" (I cannot find the precise meaning of the phrase) has to be an accumulation point for the domain, then....
 
MalleusScientiarum
As I recall an accumulation point is a point in the set A where any neighborhood of x has at least one other point in A that is not x.
 
rachmaninoff
MalleusScientiarum said:
As I recall an accumulation point is a point in the set A where any neighborhood of x has at least one other point in A that is not x.
Not necessary.
 

Related Threads for: If x is an accumulation point of set S and e >0

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
19K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Top