If I were proving that "if x is an accumulation point of set S and e >0, then there are infinite number of points within e of x", is it exactly the same as saying "if x is a limit point of set S, then every neighborhood of x contains infinitely many points of S"?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# If x is an accumulation point of set S and e >0

Loading...

Similar Threads for accumulation point | Date |
---|---|

Determine all the accumulation point. | Oct 4, 2011 |

Definition help (accumulation point/limit point) | Jul 11, 2009 |

Limits at non-accumulation points | Jan 16, 2008 |

Help~find the interior, boundary, closure and accumulation points of the following. | Oct 4, 2007 |

Help : on accumulation point | Oct 3, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**