If x is an accumulation point of set S and e >0

  • Thread starter irony of truth
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Point Set
In summary, the statement "if x is an accumulation point of set S and e >0, then there are infinite number of points within e of x" is equivalent to the statement "if x is a limit point of set S, then every neighborhood of x contains infinitely many points of S". However, it is not necessary for an accumulation point to have at least one other point in the set A that is not x.
  • #1
irony of truth
90
0
If I were proving that "if x is an accumulation point of set S and e >0, then there are infinite number of points within e of x", is it exactly the same as saying "if x is a limit point of set S, then every neighborhood of x contains infinitely many points of S"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Seems so to me.
 
  • #3
Well, a "limit point" (I cannot find the precise meaning of the phrase) has to be an accumulation point for the domain, then...
 
  • #4
As I recall an accumulation point is a point in the set A where any neighborhood of x has at least one other point in A that is not x.
 
  • #5
MalleusScientiarum said:
As I recall an accumulation point is a point in the set A where any neighborhood of x has at least one other point in A that is not x.

Not necessary.
 

1. What is an accumulation point?

An accumulation point is a point in a set S that can be approached arbitrarily closely by points in the set. This means that for any positive distance e, there exists a point in the set within e units of the accumulation point.

2. How is an accumulation point different from a limit point?

While accumulation points and limit points are often used interchangeably, there is a subtle difference between the two. An accumulation point is a point in a set that can be approached by other points in the set, while a limit point is a point in a set where every neighborhood of the point contains infinitely many points from the set.

3. Why is the distance e greater than 0 in the definition of an accumulation point?

The distance e must be greater than 0 in order to ensure that there is at least one point in the set S within e units of the accumulation point. If e was equal to 0, then there would be no guarantee that there are any points in the set within a certain distance of the accumulation point.

4. Can an accumulation point be an isolated point?

No, an accumulation point cannot be an isolated point. An isolated point is a point in a set that has a neighborhood that contains no other points from the set. However, an accumulation point, by definition, must have points from the set arbitrarily close to it, meaning it cannot be isolated.

5. How are accumulation points used in mathematical analysis?

Accumulation points are important in mathematical analysis as they help define the concepts of convergence, continuity, and compactness. They also play a crucial role in the proof of the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, which states that every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
932
Replies
2
Views
786
  • Calculus
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
981
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
317
Replies
2
Views
345
Back
Top