Im out of this forum

  • Thread starter aviator
  • Start date
  • #1
60
0
i thought it was for physics discussion but nobody answers me how a swing works or why my antigravity engine fails


here im not allowed either to discuss my idea:
http://www.advancedphysics.org/viewthread.php?tid=1496

internet censorship doesnt allow me to discuss my engine, besides most people will discuss about my person instead of about my ideas therefore ill have to do it the hard way and build it

so if in the future you hear the urban legend of a guy who built an antigravity device consisting of counterotatory cylinders with oscillating pistons inside and got killed because it lead as well to free energy you will know it was me

:devil:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
203
0
aviator,

I'm with you, I have posted many of my ideas in many forums but here it is impossible. people ussually get too hard with you, and the only place I have an aceptable state, it is in the philosophy one.

I like your antigravity device idea and other posts I ahve seen around in the link you gave up their.
 
  • #3
60
0
besides i thought that people that keeps free energy secret had forgot about this forum but seems i was wrong and they put the right mods for their purposes, deep sceptics

why is it i can talk about my antigravity engine in game forums and i cant in physics forums because they get locked
 
  • #4
Kerrie
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
839
15
well, like any private website, the admins have the power to censor. if you are so inventive, start your own website with your ideas, then no one can censor you.
 
  • #5
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
35,977
4,683
aviator said:
besides i thought that people that keeps free energy secret had forgot about this forum but seems i was wrong and they put the right mods for their purposes, deep sceptics

why is it i can talk about my antigravity engine in game forums and i cant in physics forums because they get locked

(i) Maybe because the people in the game forums are as ignorant about physics as you do. (ii) because when you start dealing with physics, then all the whole body of knowledge that is known to be valid APPLIES to whatever it is you're pushing (iii) because this forum was NOT meant for quackeries. Read the guidelines if you don't believe me.

So unless you are here to really flaunt the rules and show little respect for the main purpose of PF, then there's no reason why you should be surprised at the kind of reception you're getting. Besides, if you think it works, then BUILD the damn thing. Why are you revealing your "secrets" on here for the whole world to see? Go busy yourself with your "antigravity" and other machines rather than wasting your time on here.

... and don't let the door hit you on your rear end on your way out.

Zz.
 
  • #6
Danger
Gold Member
9,647
251
aviator said:
i thought it was for physics discussion but nobody answers me how a swing works or why my antigravity engine fails
I thought that everyone knows how a swing works: you put a kid on it and push 'til he pukes.
As for the rest of it, I've taken the liberty of going back and looking at a couple of your posts. The whole problem here is that you have no bloody idea what you're talking about! Your posts are semi-coherent at best, and your lack of knowledge of even the fundamentals of science is appalling. That would be perfectly acceptable if you came here to learn, but it's obvious that you didn't. You came to propound the crackpot theories of a couple of guys who aren't even vaguely qualified to be called scientists. There is no such thing as free energy! There is no such thing as anti-gravity! Get over it! :grumpy:
 
  • Like
Likes PaulK2
  • #7
SpaceTiger
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,956
3
Personally, I'm really grateful for the forum's level of censorship. I don't think such discussion should be stifled everywhere, but it's nice to have a set of forums in which you can be reasonably sure that people will be discussing real physics. I abandoned many of the other physics forums on the net simply because there were too many garbage posts involving people's erroneous personal theories.
 
  • #8
3,768
10
aviator said:
i thought it was for physics discussion but nobody answers me how a swing works or why my antigravity engine fails

Oh no, are you one of them Podkletnov-aficionado's ???

marlon

ps : if i were you, i wouldn't mess with CIA/FBI/SWAT-man Danger...the guy has a 190º peripheral vision... :surprised BEWARE...especially when you are NOT in front of him
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Danger
Gold Member
9,647
251
marlon said:
ps : if i were you, i wouldn't mess with CIA/FBI/SWAT-man Danger...the guy has a 190º peripheral vision... :surprised BEWARE...especially when you are NOT in front of him
That's right; I couldn't see a locomotive right in front of me, but it better not try sneaking up from behind. :bugeye:
Incidentally, those are Yank organizations. Up here its CSIS, RCMP and TAC teams. :wink:
 
  • #10
3,768
10
Danger said:
That's right; I couldn't see a locomotive right in front of me, but it better not try sneaking up from behind. :bugeye:
Incidentally, those are Yank organizations. Up here its CSIS, RCMP and TAC teams. :wink:

dammit yes, i forgot you are Canadian...Sorry man...

marlon
 
  • #11
Danger
Gold Member
9,647
251
marlon said:
dammit yes, i forgot you are Canadian...Sorry man...
No problem. I can never remember where someone is without looking, either. One of the perils of an international forum. Incidentally, as much as enjoy the goofing back and forth with you here, I must say how impressed I am with your post on 'Thin Film Interference' in GP. I don't understand most of it, but it sure is professional. You're the one this little bugger shouldn't mess with when it comes to science. :biggrin:
Okay, gotta go to work now. Catch you tonight.
 
  • #12
3,768
10
Danger said:
No problem. I can never remember where someone is without looking, either. One of the perils of an international forum. Incidentally, as much as enjoy the goofing back and forth with you here, I must say how impressed I am with your post on 'Thin Film Interference' in GP. I don't understand most of it, but it sure is professional. You're the one this little bugger shouldn't mess with when it comes to science. :biggrin:
Okay, gotta go to work now. Catch you tonight.

Danger , i like you even more and more...Did you know that my girlfriend and i dream of living in Canada? Who knows, we might meet...I am sure you will recognize me first when i am not coming from right in front of you :wink:

marlon
 
  • #13
60
0
space tiger im glad you like censorship then you must be glad on the states

here in spain we dont like that stuff since to the 75 the salute was the fascist hand raised salute

as for there not being free energy or antigravity im not sayin it certainly exists but danger you are saying radically it doesnt exist

who is the fanatic here?

obviously im talking about moving the swing with your feet if you dont know how it works say it dont make jokes about it

besides if im so very wrong wouldnt be easy to correct me instead of atacking me personally?

because i came here to learn by discussing, certainly nobody here is my master although some seem to believe to be a master teaching disciples

anyway i hope you are not like pithagoras who killed his disciple that discover the irational numbers, hey i might even get banned for this one about pithagoras
 
  • #14
3,768
10
aviator said:
space tiger im glad you like censorship then you must be glad on the states

Don't mess with SpaceTiger. I am the one to blame. I dictate what can be said and what cannot be said. SpaceTiger is too good an astrophysicist. he doesn't have the time to engage in such useless discussions as the one you have started here. I has far too much research to do...I don't...

hey i might even get banned for this one about pithagoras

First of all, it's Pythagoras
Secondly, where is your Theorem ?


Ohh, you don't have one ? Well, then don't compare yourself to somebody of that stature

marlon, the little one
 
  • #15
SpaceTiger said:
Personally, I'm really grateful for the forum's level of censorship. I don't think such discussion should be stifled everywhere, but it's nice to have a set of forums in which you can be reasonably sure that people will be discussing real physics. I abandoned many of the other physics forums on the net simply because there were too many garbage posts involving people's erroneous personal theories.
I agree. If this forum was not the way it was in maintaining a certain standard for posts, I would of left awhile ago.

As for you aviator, I would probably recommend that you humble yourself and try to actually learn some actual physics.

-TK
 
  • #16
60
0
"Ohh, you don't have one ? Well, then don't compare yourself to somebody of that stature"

of course i dont compare with a murderer like pitagoras

why there int a section for sfringe science like mine?

what happens with john hutchinson reality?


should i humble in front of people that admires a murderer because hes got a great theoreme?
i was taught rightly not to do so
 
  • #17
3,768
10
aviator said:
"Ohh, you don't have one ? Well, then don't compare yourself to somebody of that stature"

of course i dont compare with a murderer like pitagoras

why there int a section for sfringe science like mine?

what happens with john hutchinson reality?


should i humble in front of people that admires a murderer because hes got a great theoreme?
i was taught rightly not to do so

Learn your English. I can hardly understand what you are trying to say. Or do you only write ancient Greek ?

Are you saying that Pyhtagoras is a murderer ???

marlon
 
  • #18
1,430
6
aviator said:
"Ohh, you don't have one ? Well, then don't compare yourself to somebody of that stature"

of course i dont compare with a murderer like pitagoras

why there int a section for sfringe science like mine?

what happens with john hutchinson reality?


should i humble in front of people that admires a murderer because hes got a great theoreme?
i was taught rightly not to do so


There is a forum for your nuttery, its called Theory Development. Go there, and stay there.
 
  • #19
3,768
10
franznietzsche said:
There is a forum for your nuttery, its called Theory Development. Go there, and stay there.

and take pitagoras with you :rofl:
 
  • #20
SpaceTiger
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,956
3
marlon said:
Don't mess with SpaceTiger. I am the one to blame. I dictate what can be said and what cannot be said. SpaceTiger is too good an astrophysicist. he doesn't have the time to engage in such useless discussions as the one you have started here. I has far too much research to do...I don't...

I don't consider my time any more valuable than anyone else's, but I certainly would say that further arguing with this guy is a waste of it.
 
  • #21
60
0
yes pithagoras killed his disciple who discover the irrational numbers

ive been taught so by my father who is a mathematician who wrote 14 books of investigation

in the theory development my ideas about hutchinson and antigravity get locked as well

for my two questions of how a swing works and what fails in my reactionless idea i didnt got a single clarification but a lot of personal attacks

thats why im out of this forum besides i dont even have the chance to discuss my reactionless idea because only the idea that the burka is wrong seems to offend here
 
  • #22
Nereid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,392
3
aviator said:
as for there not being free energy or antigravity im not sayin it certainly exists but danger you are saying radically it doesnt exist
aviator, I personally don't like it when a PF member decides to leave, and like to understand why they make such decisions.

In so far as your posts here reflect your interests and expectations, I'm curious as to why you haven't been able to
a) ask questions about the ideas you seem to have, in a way that avoids creating the impression that you are merely 'parroting crackpottery'
b) understand the content of the posts which folk here have made in response to your questions, to help you understand better the 'mainstream' theories (from which, I might add, were built the computer and internet that you are able to use to make your posts here in the first place)
c) distinguish between frustration at your apparent inability to grasp the basic concepts of classical physics (let alone QFT or GR) and some kind of political conspiracy
d) find another forum (than PF; 'forum' in the normal English sense) where your ideas can be discussed and debated (perhaps I didn't say this very well; what I mean is, why do/did you consider PF as a good place - potentially - to air your ideas and ask your questions?)

Wrt 'free energy' and 'anti-gravity', I think it's fair to say that most, if not almost all, PF members would be truly fascinated by either possibility! However, I suspect that a very large majority of those who would be interested would also examine any claim to either quite critically.
 
  • #23
60
0
im mentally ill i have suffered two psicotic episodes though with medication i seem to do all right but this doesnt prove me wrong

i have deviced this antigravity engine 4 years ago and ever since i have tried to understand how it works

now i think i do so and i just thought the best place to discuss it was the most visited physics forum

looking for similar things i found about schauberger, clem, joseph newman, the disclosure project, Cowlishaw engine very similar to mine, nick cook reactionlees engine as well that seems to achieve ounces of thrust, as well as frolov ideas about gyroscopes of varying radius that produce reactionless thrust and this things have in common a spiral pattern

the problem is that i just dont find a place to discuss this with physicist that think like me or like all this people mentioned before

my intention is to help the world and most of what i get are attacks and not a single discusion of my ideas and besides my reactionless idea gets censored

if this is not the right place to discuss the reactionless properties of gyroscopes of varying radius i would thank anybody who point me to a place to discuss it because at this moment im discussing it with positive answers in a planes game forum

this goes both to the people with good intention and to the people who dislike crackpots please point me to a place to discuss my ideas
 
  • #24
Nereid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,392
3
<<<GUILLE>>> said:
aviator,

I'm with you, I have posted many of my ideas in many forums but here it is impossible. people ussually get too hard with you, and the only place I have an aceptable state, it is in the philosophy one.

I like your antigravity device idea and other posts I ahve seen around in the link you gave up their.
Hello <<<GUILLE>>>,

I did a quick check on the posts you made here in PF, and I didn't find any by you in the main physics/astronomy sections (quite a few in Brain Teasers, some in Philosophy, some in GD).

Do you mind if I ask what sorts of things you have tried to post in Physics or Astronomy? In what way have you found that 'people ussually get too hard with you'?
 
  • #25
enigma
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,754
15

Related Threads on Im out of this forum

Replies
6
Views
739
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
51
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Top