- #1
rachmaninoff
For the life of me I can't remember the past tense of "to meet", as in "to meet with". And you know, this IS my native language.
arildno said:met, mayhap?
BobG said:It would be better to claim you're drunk. If you were so drunk right now, you could look forward to being sober tomorrow. :rofl:
The most common challenge for native speakers when using the past tense of "meet" is knowing whether to use "met" or "meet". This is because "meet" can be both the present and past tense form of the verb depending on the context.
To determine whether to use "met" or "meet" in a sentence, you need to identify the tense of the sentence. If the sentence is in the past tense, then you should use "met". If the sentence is in the present tense, then you should use "meet".
Yes, "meet" can be used as both a regular and irregular verb in the past tense. When used as a regular verb, the past tense form is "met". When used as an irregular verb, the past tense form is also "met".
No, there are no other forms of the past tense of "meet". The only other forms that exist are the present tense form "meet" and the past participle form "met".
You can practice using the past tense of "meet" correctly by reading and writing sentences using the verb in different tenses. It may also be helpful to ask a native speaker or a language teacher for guidance and feedback. Additionally, you can use online resources or grammar books to learn the rules and exceptions for using the past tense of "meet".