- #1

- 365

- 34

- B
- Thread starter Chris Miller
- Start date

- #1

- 365

- 34

- #2

- 32,969

- 11,445

What is "imaginary time constriction"?imaginary time constriction

Have you tried to work this out mathematically? What does the math tell you?Is it true that, just mathematically, as v exceeds c the Lorentz factor approaches 0i

- #3

Nugatory

Mentor

- 13,246

- 6,128

The Lorentz transforms are derived starting from assumptions that are equivalent to assuming that ##v## must be less than ##c##. Thus, the complex numbers that appear when you try plugging in a speed greater than ##c## tell you nothing except that you're using the formula in a situation where it doesn't apply.

- #4

- 365

- 34

- #5

- 7,402

- 6,490

I think @Nugatory's answer is best. It doesn't make sense to do this. When you insert ##v>c## you may be defining some kind of coordinate system, but it doesn't have the naive interpretation you are trying to put on it.

- #6

- 32,969

- 11,445

A multiple ofBy "constriction" I meant the opposite of dilation. I assumed that if time dilates as the Lorentz factor approaches infinity, then it must constrict as it approaches 0 (times i).

- #7

- 365

- 34

- #8

PAllen

Science Advisor

- 8,269

- 1,522

Which is greater, north or east? That’s silimar to trying compare real and imaginary numbers.

- #9

- 32,969

- 11,445

No. I'm saying that you can't just wave your hands and say a complex number for the ##\gamma## factor means what you are saying it means.Are you saying complex numbers have no use in physics?

Your hesitation is warranted. Unlike real numbers, complex numbers are not totally ordered, so the comparison operators don't make sense for them the way they do for reals.I'll admit to having a very weak grasp of complex numbers. Like even a simple statement like 2i < 3i I'm not sure is true, or if the < operator's use in it is valid.

- #10

- 55

- 4

A prerequisite so to speak for the Lorenz transform is that v<c... therefore that restriction must be assumed if you want to even consider the factor itself

- #11

- 365

- 34

Ha ha Peter. Didn't mean to wave my hands. Maybe it's my Italian roots. Also I'm not sure what I'm saying by "imaginary time contraction." What do you imagine I'm saying?

- #12

- 32,969

- 11,445

They don't. They lie in a plane. Points in a plane do not have a linear order.I understand they can't be compared to reals, but would've thought they lay on a number line in some order.

I don't think you're saying anything meaningful at all.I'm not sure what I'm saying by "imaginary time contraction." What do you imagine I'm saying?

- #13

- 8,499

- 2,635

There might be a way to extend SR to describe FTL reference frames, but SR certainly doesn't have them.

- Last Post

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 30

- Views
- 13K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 877

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 3K