- #1

- 371

- 35

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- B
- Thread starter Chris Miller
- Start date

The Lorentz transformations are used to describe the relationship between coordinates used in different inertial frames. Special Relativity doesn't assume the existence (or meaningfulness) of two inertial frames whose relative speed is faster than the...Have you tried to work this out mathematically? What does the math tell you?I think @Nugatory's answer is best. It doesn't make sense to do this. When you insert ##v>c## you may be defining some kind of coordinate system, but it doesn't have the naive interpretation you are trying to put on it.

- #1

- 371

- 35

Physics news on Phys.org

- #2

Mentor

- 43,739

- 21,233

Chris Miller said:imaginary time constriction

What is "imaginary time constriction"?

Chris Miller said:Is it true that, just mathematically, as v exceeds c the Lorentz factor approaches 0i

Have you tried to work this out mathematically? What does the math tell you?

- #3

Mentor

- 14,586

- 8,858

The Lorentz transforms are derived starting from assumptions that are equivalent to assuming that ##v## must be less than ##c##. Thus, the complex numbers that appear when you try plugging in a speed greater than ##c## tell you nothing except that you're using the formula in a situation where it doesn't apply.Chris Miller said:

- #4

- 371

- 35

- #5

- 11,162

- 12,611

I think @Nugatory's answer is best. It doesn't make sense to do this. When you insert ##v>c## you may be defining some kind of coordinate system, but it doesn't have the naive interpretation you are trying to put on it.Chris Miller said:

- #6

Mentor

- 43,739

- 21,233

Chris Miller said:By "constriction" I meant the opposite of dilation. I assumed that if time dilates as the Lorentz factor approaches infinity, then it must constrict as it approaches 0 (times i).

A multiple of

- #7

- 371

- 35

- #8

Science Advisor

- 9,090

- 2,317

Which is greater, north or east? That’s silimar to trying compare real and imaginary numbers.

- #9

Mentor

- 43,739

- 21,233

Chris Miller said:Are you saying complex numbers have no use in physics?

No. I'm saying that you can't just wave your hands and say a complex number for the ##\gamma## factor means what you are saying it means.

Chris Miller said:I'll admit to having a very weak grasp of complex numbers. Like even a simple statement like 2i < 3i I'm not sure is true, or if the < operator's use in it is valid.

Your hesitation is warranted. Unlike real numbers, complex numbers are not totally ordered, so the comparison operators don't make sense for them the way they do for reals.

- #10

- 55

- 4

Chris Miller said:

A prerequisite so to speak for the Lorenz transform is that v<c... therefore that restriction must be assumed if you want to even consider the factor itself

- #11

- 371

- 35

Ha ha Peter. Didn't mean to wave my hands. Maybe it's my Italian roots. Also I'm not sure what I'm saying by "imaginary time contraction." What do you imagine I'm saying?

- #12

Mentor

- 43,739

- 21,233

Chris Miller said:I understand they can't be compared to reals, but would've thought they lay on a number line in some order.

They don't. They lie in a plane. Points in a plane do not have a linear order.

Chris Miller said:I'm not sure what I'm saying by "imaginary time contraction." What do you imagine I'm saying?

I don't think you're saying anything meaningful at all.

- #13

- 8,938

- 2,926

There might be a way to extend SR to describe FTL reference frames, but SR certainly doesn't have them.

Share:

- Replies
- 32

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 16

- Views
- 468

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 702

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 643

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 650

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 487

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 764

- Replies
- 72

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K