Hello, some operators seem to "add up" and give real eigenvalues only if they are applied on the imaginary position, ix, rather than the normal position operator, x, in the integral :(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

\begin{equation}

\langle Bx, x\rangle

\end{equation}

when replaced by:

\begin{equation}

\langle Bix, ix\rangle

\end{equation}

or

\begin{equation}

\langle Bix, x\rangle

\end{equation}

So using (2) or even (3) I get real (but negative) eigenvalues, instead of complex eigenvalues. I have not found any literature on such an absurd thing, as the imaginary position, however, being the only answer to these operators, I am wondering if anyone can point to some further literature on complex operators and complex eigenvalues in QM and whether (2) and (3) make any sense at all

Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Imaginary position operator

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Imaginary position operator | Date |
---|---|

I Does the Schrödinger equation link position and momentum? | Yesterday at 11:59 AM |

A Several ground state calculations at once | Aug 26, 2017 |

A Similarity in form of time-evolution and Gibbs weight? | Jul 13, 2017 |

I Expectation value with imaginary component? | Feb 18, 2017 |

I Integrating imaginary units and operators | Nov 29, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**