In Griffiths' page 36/37 he says "As we'll see in Chapter 3, what |Cn|^2 tells you is the probability that a measurement of the energy would yield the value En (a competent measurement will always return one of the "allowed" values - hence the name - and |Cn|^2 is the probability of getting the particular value En."(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

This statement comes at the end of the infinite square well section and it concerns any sum of stationary states.

Wouldn't measuring one of the allowed energies "En", mean collapsing the wave function into the nth stationary state (and that state only!)? Doesn't that mean that the wave function has then assumed a single stationary state, thereby guaranteeing all subsequent energy measurements of the wave function to yield that particular En?

This seems to disagree with my intuition about what happens to a wave function after measurement (that it would "delocalize" in energy space) and it disagrees with my professor's interpretation who literally takes issue with the statement that an energy measurement must yield one of the allowed values. He says that it can yield any value, and that a mix/sum of specific n states are responsible for returning a non-"allowed" En.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Implication of energy measurement for wave function as a sum of stationary states

Loading...

Similar Threads for Implication energy measurement | Date |
---|---|

B What does the 'space' inside an atom consist of? | Apr 15, 2018 |

A Implications of violation of Leggett–Garg inequality | Dec 4, 2017 |

I Implication of eigenstates that are not normalizable | Apr 1, 2016 |

A Hawking multiverse implications for "all" histories | Mar 21, 2016 |

Implications of the no-clone theorem | Aug 12, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**