For couple of days now I've been trying to figure out the implicit function theorem. Especially why we have to be(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); neara point, why can't we be exactly in the point when trying to find out y as a function of x.

Let's take an easy equation as an example. Find [tex]y=y(x)[/tex] when [tex]f(x,y)=x^2+y^2-1[/tex]. If I solve this for y, it gives me [tex]y=\sqrt{1-x^2}[/tex] and [tex]y=-\sqrt{1-x^2}[/tex]. Now there shouldn't be any reasons for why I can't calculate y, when x=1. But if I use the implicit function theorem, it says you can't define y=y(x) at x=0, because [tex]f_y(x,y(x))=0[/tex].

Now ignore the fact that the function in the example is defined explicitly, think we had an implicit function that behaved like the one here. Can anybody explain me why is this?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Implicit function theorem, theory help.

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**