Hi! I've got a question about implicit functions.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have to solve a system f(x,y,z)=0 in the neighbourhood of (1,1,1). I have a problem computing the derivative of an implicit function (x,y)=g(z), whose existence is given by the implicit function theorem when applied to the given function f(x,y,z) which goes from R^3 to R^2. I use as it seems two equivalent standard methods.

I compute the Jacobi matrix of f and check whether the minor - a square matrix - is invertible at the given point. Then I invert it and with one more step get the derivative of g at z=1.

The other method is: I use implicit differentiation, i.e. I differentiate the system f(x,y,z)=0 directly and get differentials dg_1/dz, dg_2/dz (because g is two-component).

Now I get two different answers with either method. The difference is only the sign, but I cannot figure out WHY there is sign change! Is there anything I should pay attention to when I use these two methods? I mean they are basically the same! I checked each step in both of them. What could be the reason for the difference?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Implicit Function

Loading...

Similar Threads - Implicit Function | Date |
---|---|

I Implicit differentiation | Sep 29, 2016 |

Question about the implicit function theorem | Feb 16, 2016 |

Functional relation and implicit functions | Nov 18, 2014 |

Leibnitz's notation and derivatives of implicit functions | Aug 26, 2014 |

Converting implicit function to explicit | May 22, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**