Impossible creation of potential energy

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of potential difference and how it relates to electricity. The analogy of a ball dropping and being raised again is used to explain the effect of inserting a resistance in a closed circuit. The experts in the conversation clarify that voltage is not energy and that it is essentially constant along a wire, while also mentioning the limitations of physical analogies when trying to understand electricity.
  • #1
beckett
11
0
Hi folks,

Sorry for this second post so quick but its bugging me! I have been reconsidering some fundamentals of electrics and have opened a can of worms for myself (thanks Cliff for closing the lid on the previous one). If i consider again a simple closed DC circuit consisting of a wire and a pd applied across it i.e:-

+10V-------------------->------------------0V

If i look upon the circuit as above (i know this is an unconventional view but it better illustrates my dilema), a steady current flows in the direction indicated. By definition each coulomb of charge leaving the +10V end of the wire will have lost 10 joules of energy by the time it reaches the 0V end of the wire. If we imagine the wire itself as series of resistors then we can label the pd along the wire as:

+10V---9---8---7---6---5---4---3---2---1---0V

Imagine a coulomb of charge has traveled all the way to were the pd is 1V, we say it has lost 9 joules and can only possibly lose 1 more before being raised to +10 again by the source.
Now imagine i instantaneously insert a high resistance between the coulomb and the 0V end of the wire. The pd across this resistor would now be tending towards 10V and the coulomb would have to cross this before getting to 0V. This means that the coulomb has lost more than the possible 10V in potential energy? What am i doing wrong??

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Voltage is not energy.

Voltage is essentially constant along a wire.

No power source can provide its rated voltage through a short (any power supply has an internal resistance that prevents it).

Transients are transient.

Your example is of one big, long resistor (such as a light bulb filament), which dissipates energy all along its length.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
The potential drop along the wire is not directly connected to electrons "traveling" the distance, see my post in the other thread. The key word here is POTENTIAL difference. Electrons at the 1v location feel a 1 volt potential those at the 5V point feel a 5V potential. It does not matter where the electrons started it only matters where they are with respect to the total resistance of the circuit. Does this help understanding what happens when you insert a different resistance?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
russ_watters: Thanks for the reply. I'm slightly confused when you say that voltage is essentially constant along a wire. What is a piece of wire if not one big long resistor/series of resistors. If its the internal resistance that provides the problem then if we use a 'wire' that is sufficiently high that the internal resistance is negligible would you still say that in the closed circuit with current flowing that the voltage is still essentially constant along a wire?

Integral: I think i understand were you are coming from, do you mean that by inserting the resistance you simply 're-arrange' the pd across the circuit so you effectively raise the pd of the coulomb again which it can then lose again??
I keep trying to compare the pd with gravitational potential energy as this is easier to imagine. Could i say that the equivalent of the problem would be to let a ball drop 9m from a height e.g. 10m. and the act of inserting the resistance would be equivalent to me raising the ball again and letting it drop more slowly??
 
  • #5
Physical analogies are a tough cookie, its difficult to create a good model that encompasses all the nuances that make up the term 'electricity' without leaving something out. Its surprising how many people misunderstand electricity by taking the "electricity flows like water" metaphor too far and out of context. That said, I'm going to take a stab at your question and analogy.

If we were to move these experiments in the physical world to water and not air as the medium where the object is traveling, bouyancy would need to be factored in as well as the fluid dynamics of our object traveling through the water to account for losses but potential energy is calculated as the same even if the results are far different.

Think of it like this: potential energy is calculated with gravity as the source. Well, the battery/power supply here needs to be the source. Normally, we could consider this constant. You're roughly treating the current flow as if it were a changable mass in your PE calculations which isn't very analogous.

The wire as a dead short, translated loosely into physical terms, could be the center of a black hole or your favorite sub-atomic particle only 10m from the surface of the earth. With either, PE will be secondary to very large 'factors' changing the outcome. :smile: Back to reality, a dead short will do little besides heat up a wire and cook the battery (because the battery is flowing a lot of current across its own internal resistance). The wire will not show a drop from 10V to 0V across it, probably more like 1V or 2V depending on your battery. Regardless, it would be similar to non-linear behavior since other factors take precedence.

Lets just use a series of resistors to keep things in a linear range. If you suddenly 'swap' a high resistance in place of a lower one, you see a sudden drop in current flow. Changing the current flowing in the circuit doesn't change the voltage at the battery anymore than changing the mass in your PE equations changes the constant acceleration you use for gravity. See where I'm going with this line of thinking?

Cliff

P.S. Someone please correct me if my analogy has too many holes in it.
 

1. What is potential energy and how is it created?

Potential energy is the energy possessed by an object due to its position or state. It can be created through various processes such as lifting an object against gravity, compressing a spring, or separating electric charges. These processes involve storing energy in the object's position or configuration, which can later be released and converted into other forms of energy.

2. Is it truly impossible to create potential energy?

No, it is not impossible to create potential energy. In fact, potential energy is continuously being created and converted in various forms in our everyday lives. For example, when we charge a battery, we are creating potential energy in the form of chemical energy. However, the total amount of potential energy in a closed system remains constant, according to the law of conservation of energy.

3. Can potential energy be created out of nothing?

No, potential energy cannot be created out of nothing. As mentioned before, the total amount of potential energy in a closed system remains constant. This means that potential energy can only be transferred or converted from one form to another, but it cannot be created or destroyed.

4. Are there any exceptions to the law of conservation of energy?

No, the law of conservation of energy is a fundamental principle of physics that has been proven through countless experiments. It states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another. This law has been consistently observed and has not been found to have any exceptions.

5. What are the practical implications of the concept of impossible creation of potential energy?

The concept of impossible creation of potential energy has important practical implications in the field of engineering. It is crucial to understand and apply the principles of potential energy conservation in designing and building structures, machines, and devices that rely on potential energy for their operation. By following the laws of physics, we can ensure the safety, efficiency, and sustainability of our creations.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
792
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
772
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
1K
Back
Top