- #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 4,446
- 558
In latin unknowing = insciens ,so is everyone in science unknowing?
wolram said:In latin unknowing = insciens ,so is everyone in science unknowing?
Im not sure which one to support, i know aids is a big problem, but so arehypnagogue said:in = not, sciens = knowing... Notice the word "science" doesn't have the "in" modifier. Science derives from the Latin scire, "to know," more particularly the present participle sciens, "knowing."
By removing ones brain.GOD__AM said:How does one exactally get in science?
matthyaouw said:However, no theory or hypothesis can ever be proven 100% correct, therefore, it could be said that no scientist 'knows' anything.
"Insciens" is a Latin word that means "unknowing" or "ignorant".
In the context of science, being "insciens" means recognizing that there is still much to learn and discover, and that no one has all the answers.
No, it is not a bad thing to be "insciens" as a scientist. In fact, it is a natural and necessary part of the scientific process to acknowledge and work towards filling in the gaps in our knowledge.
Yes, someone can still be considered a scientist even if they are "insciens". Being "insciens" does not mean lacking knowledge or expertise, but rather acknowledging the limits of our current understanding.
We can overcome our "insciens" nature in science by continuously seeking new knowledge, questioning existing theories, and conducting thorough and rigorous research. Collaboration and open-mindedness are also key in expanding our understanding as scientists.