I In what cases does dimensional analysis fail?

  • Thread starter VVS2000
  • Start date

berkeman

Mentor
55,345
5,519
The dimensiona of lambda is (time)^-1, time inverse, basically frequency. .M is mass. That is given. I dont or I am not quite sure on c
The starting equation contains forces. What are the units of force in mks? Each term has to have those same units, right? That helps you figure out the units for the other terms that introduced in the later equations. And yes, since λt is in the exponent, and since the exponent needs to be dimensionless, the units of λ need to be 1/s.
 

A.T.

Science Advisor
9,567
1,468
In what cases does dimensional analysis fails?
Not sure what 'fails' means here, but dimensional homogeneity doesn't guarantee that your equation is physically sensible:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_analysis#Dimensional_homogeneity
Even when two physical quantities have identical dimensions, it may nevertheless be meaningless to compare or add them. For example, although torque and energy share the dimension L2MT−2, they are fundamentally different physical quantities.
 
22
2
The starting equation contains forces. What are the units of force in mks? Each term has to have those same units, right? That helps you figure out the units for the other terms that introduced in the later equations. And yes, since λt is in the exponent, and since the exponent needs to be dimensionless, the units of λ need to be 1/s.
Yeah ok so c has units of M(T)^-1
 
22
2
Not sure what 'fails' means here, but dimensional homogeneity doesn't guarantee that your equation is physically sensible:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_analysis#Dimensional_homogeneity
Even when two physical quantities have identical dimensions, it may nevertheless be meaningless to compare or add them. For example, although torque and energy share the dimension L2MT−2, they are fundamentally different physical quantities.
Yeah sorry. I think I did'nt frame my question in the proper way. So the math part of the equation can be checked out but it will not be wise to try and infer the physics aspect of it
 
19,177
3,787
The dimensiona of lambda is (time)^-1, time inverse, basically frequency. .M is mass. That is given. I dont or I am not quite sure on c
That’s correct.
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"In what cases does dimensional analysis fail?" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: In what cases does dimensional analysis fail?

Replies
2
Views
173
Replies
6
Views
605
  • Posted
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
478
Replies
3
Views
3K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top