Increasing Heat Transfer Area

In summary, the speaker is seeking suggestions on how to increase the heat transfer area in order to achieve a desired temperature in an assembly using a starwound cable heater to heat up a flow of air. They have tried using metallic wool or meshing around the heater, but it has not been efficient. Suggestions are given to use a spiral wound coil that covers the whole area, or to use a heatsink with a heating pad attached. The speaker also mentions time constraints and a desired temperature of 350C, which they have not been able to achieve even with the use of steel wire wool. Preheating the air is also suggested as a potential solution. The main issue is that the heater was not properly designed for the requirements, and
  • #36
I have tried with low flow rate. The heat transfer is much less. My air is coming out from a compressed air cylinder. Could you please explain why the heater is not able to heat the air? could it be because of heat loss through the walls?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #37
ruzfactor said:
I have tried with low flow rate. The heat transfer is much less. My air is coming out from a compressed air cylinder. Could you please explain why the heater is not able to heat the air? could it be because of heat loss through the walls?

Which heat transfer is much less? Heat flux into the reactor? Does that matter if it heats more slowly? Did you see the air temperature (or heater temperature) increase with a low flow rate?

I'd really like some idea of the flow rate to quantify it. However it's hard to imagine anything else besides loss through the walls.
 
  • #38
Heat transfer is much less in case of low flow rate. I need the reactor to be heated within a shorter period. But it all failed. A new design is the only solution I guess. Is the heat capacity of damp air higher than the dry air? How can I prove (theoretically) that damp air could improve heat transfer? Need some help on that.
 
  • #39
Is there any effect on temperature, when a flow experience sudden enlargement?
 
  • #40
It's a pity you can't know the mass flow rate. With that and your existing measurements you can confidently estimate the losses and predict what wattage heater is required.

I probably know no more than you about using wet air. My guess is it would have a higher heat capacity, but I don't think that's important, just using a higher flow rate should do the same job.

I really think you should work out what went wrong with this design before trying something fancy. Otherwise the fancy thing will fail too. You can probably do it just by replacing the heating element if you have some data to make predictions with.

Is there a reason you don't have the heater wound around the reactor? Why transfer it so far through air? And why is the air flowing?

When gas expands it cools. That will be happening to the gas coming out of the tank. It could easily be below 0C, but probably not enough to make a difference to the overall design.
 

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
732
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
475
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
823
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top