Independent Subspace: Proving (or Disproving) Linear Independence

In summary, the conversation discusses the independence of two sets of basis vectors, B and D, in spaces V and T respectively. The question at hand is whether the independence of B and D implies the independence of C and D. The participants suggest that this can be proven by showing that C and D cannot be expressed as linear combinations of each other, with an example provided using scalar d.
  • #1
hayu601
8
0
Suppose B = {b1,...,bn} and C={c1,...,cn} both are basis set for space V.
D = {d1,...,dn} is basis for space T.

If B and D is linearly independent, is C and D always independent too? How can we prove (disprove) it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't know what you mean by two sets of vectors being "independent". By saying that "B and D is linearly independent" do you mean that the set [itex]B\times D[/itex] is a set of independent vectors in [itex]V\times T[/itex]?
 
  • #3
It means that every bi element B is not linear combination of vectors in D
 
  • #4
If B and C are both separate basis for V, then C = aB.

And if B and D are linearly independent, Bb != D and thus, Bab = Cb != Da

So Cd != D for some scalar d=b/a

That's basically what you have to prove in a more elegant form.
 

1. What is an independent subspace?

An independent subspace is a subset of a vector space that contains vectors that are not linearly dependent on each other. This means that none of the vectors in the subspace can be written as a linear combination of the other vectors in the subspace.

2. How do you prove linear independence in a subspace?

To prove linear independence in a subspace, you can use the definition of linear independence and show that no linear combination of the vectors in the subspace can equal the zero vector, except for the trivial solution where all coefficients are equal to zero. You can also use the determinant test or the rank-nullity theorem to prove linear independence.

3. What does it mean to disprove linear independence in a subspace?

To disprove linear independence in a subspace means to show that at least one vector in the subspace can be written as a linear combination of the other vectors in the subspace. This would violate the definition of linear independence and prove that the subspace is not linearly independent.

4. Can a subspace be both independent and dependent?

No, a subspace cannot be both independent and dependent. By definition, a subspace is either linearly independent or linearly dependent. If a subspace is independent, none of the vectors in the subspace can be written as a linear combination of the other vectors. If a subspace is dependent, at least one vector can be written as a linear combination of the other vectors.

5. Why is it important to prove or disprove linear independence in a subspace?

Proving or disproving linear independence in a subspace is important because it allows us to understand the structure and properties of the subspace. Linearly independent subspaces have unique properties and can be used to solve systems of equations and perform other calculations. On the other hand, linearly dependent subspaces can cause problems and inaccuracies in calculations, so it is important to identify and address them.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
449
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
949
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
277
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
456
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
34
Views
2K
Back
Top