Proving that Both m and n are Odd using Indirect Proof

  • Thread starter blimkie
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, using the method of indirect proof, if m and n are integers and their product mn is odd, it can be proven that both m and n are odd. This can be shown by assuming either m or n to be even and then using the divisibility test to show that one of them must be an even number, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, both m and n must be odd.
  • #1
blimkie
111
0
use the method of indirect proof. if m and n are integars and there product mn is odd, prove that both m and n are odd

so i wnat to prove that (m)(n) odd (mn)

so i assume that (mn) is even to go about the indirect method

now i need a jump start i wrote some equations and some algebra but dindt come up with a contradication

help is appreciative that's a lot guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Start off by

[tex] m = 2k+1 [/tex]

[tex] n = 2c + 1 [/tex]

where k and c is any natural number.
 
  • #3
Using contradiction (indirect proof), you can assume either m or n to be even (that is, a multiple of two) and show that mn must also be even.
 
  • #4
Cyclovenom said:
Start off by
[tex] m = 2k+1 [/tex]
[tex] n = 2c + 1 [/tex]
where k and c is any natural number.

No, that's exactly the wrong thing to do.

Since blimkie wants to use indirect proof to prove that "both m and n must be odd, he should negate that: "either m or n is even".

So assume m= 2p, which is even for any integer p, multiply by n and see what happens!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
A number to be even it should be divisible by 2. thus for the product mn to be divisible by 2 any of the integers m or n must be divisible by prime 2. thus the divisibility testdiectlygives you the answer that then anyone of them must be an even number.
 

What is an indirect proof?

An indirect proof, also known as proof by contradiction, is a method of proving a statement by assuming its opposite and showing that it leads to a contradiction or absurdity.

Why use an indirect proof to prove that both m and n are odd?

Indirect proof is useful when a direct proof is difficult or impossible to construct. In this case, it can be challenging to directly prove that both m and n are odd, so an indirect proof may be a more effective approach.

What is the first step in an indirect proof for proving that both m and n are odd?

The first step is to assume the opposite of the statement we want to prove, in this case, that either m or n (or both) are even.

How do we continue the proof after assuming that either m or n (or both) are even?

We then use this assumption to reach a contradiction or absurdity. This can be done by using the properties of even and odd numbers, such as the fact that the product of two even numbers is also even.

What is the final step in an indirect proof for proving that both m and n are odd?

If we reach a contradiction or absurdity, it means that our initial assumption (that either m or n, or both, are even) must be false. Therefore, both m and n must be odd.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
634
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top