- #1

Palindrom

- 263

- 0

Say I have two inner product spaces, V and W.

What is the definition of their tensor product?

Is this product naturally always an inner product space?

Thank!

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Palindrom
- Start date

- #1

Palindrom

- 263

- 0

Say I have two inner product spaces, V and W.

What is the definition of their tensor product?

Is this product naturally always an inner product space?

Thank!

- #2

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,391

- 1,628

the tensor product of V and W is bydefinition any vector space V(tens)W equipped with a bilinear map VxW-->V(tens)W such that every bilinear map VxW-->U into any vector spave U, occurs uniquely as a composition VxW-->V(tens)W-->U, for some unique lienar map V(tens)W-->U.

if the spaces are finite dimensional it can be constructed as the dual of the space of bilinear functions from VxW to the scalar field k. if v1,...vn, and w1,...wm are bases of V and W, then the bilinear functions taking (vi,wj) to 1 and the other pairs to zero, form a basis of the dual of the tensor product. hence the tensor product has dimension equal to the product of the dimensions of V and W.

now ask yourself how to use the inner products on V and W to define one on V(tens)W.

i.e. how would you define <vtensw, v'tensw'>. is your definition bilinear? positive definite?

if the spaces are finite dimensional it can be constructed as the dual of the space of bilinear functions from VxW to the scalar field k. if v1,...vn, and w1,...wm are bases of V and W, then the bilinear functions taking (vi,wj) to 1 and the other pairs to zero, form a basis of the dual of the tensor product. hence the tensor product has dimension equal to the product of the dimensions of V and W.

now ask yourself how to use the inner products on V and W to define one on V(tens)W.

i.e. how would you define <vtensw, v'tensw'>. is your definition bilinear? positive definite?

Last edited:

- #3

Palindrom

- 263

- 0

And I'm still thinking about that inner product.

- #4

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,391

- 1,628

i.e. if v,w Re elements of V,W then v(tens)w is an element dual to the space of bilinear functions on VxW.

e.g. if F( , ) is a bilinear function on VxW, then v(tens)w acts on F by sending F to

F(v,w), a number.

- #5

Palindrom

- 263

- 0

Is the map you mentioned (that is, (vi,wj) |----> f(vk,wl)=delta(k,i)*delta(j,l)) defined linearly or bilinearly?

That is, if f is assigned to (vi,wj) and g to (vk,wl), then the functional assigned to (vi+vk,wj+wl) is f+g, or f+g+h+t, when h and t are assigned to the two remaining pairs?

I'm sorry for the annoying questions, I'm just trying to understand the nature of the connection between VxW and V(tens)W.

- #6

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,391

- 1,628

as such it induces a linear map G:V(tens)W-->k such that G(v(tens)w) = F(v,w).

VxW is a vector space of dimension dimV + dimW. V(tens)W has dimension dim(V).dim(W).

If v1,...vn, w1,...,wm are bases of V and W, then (v1,0),...,(vn,0),(0,w1),...(0,wm) is a basis of VxW.

while (v1(tens)w1),...,(vn(tens)wm)), is a basis of V(tens)W.

there is a bilinear map from VxW to V(tens)W, that takes (v,w) to v(tens)w.

but not everything in V(tens)W has that form. for instance v1(tens)w1 + v2(tens)w2 is also an element of V(tens)W. I.e. typical elements of V(tens)W are sums of things like v(tens)w.

- #7

Palindrom

- 263

- 0

So in order to define the inner product on V(tens)W, let's take two guys from there, a and b. They can each be broken into sums of v(tens)w. We'll define the inner product of v(tens)w with u(tens)x as <v,u><w,x>. This induces an inner product on all of V(tens)W, since the inner product must be bilinear.

I'm just trying to see if it is, indeed, an inner product. Am I on the right track?

- #8

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,391

- 1,628

well that was my idea. does it have the right properties?

- #9

Palindrom

- 263

- 0

Thanks a lot, you don't know how much you've helped me. It's been bothering me for weeks.

- #10

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,391

- 1,628

try choosing bases.

i.e. maybe if e1,...,en, and f1,...,fm are orthonormal bases for V,W, then {ei(tens)fj} is an orthonormal basis for V(tens)W.

that should do it. ?

i.e. maybe if e1,...,en, and f1,...,fm are orthonormal bases for V,W, then {ei(tens)fj} is an orthonormal basis for V(tens)W.

that should do it. ?

Last edited:

- #11

Palindrom

- 263

- 0

I've run into this problem in a class in Quantum Physics, of all things.

Share:

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 360

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 498

- Last Post

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 669

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 17

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 37

- Views
- 5K