Industrial revolution before the Iron Age?

In summary, the conversation discusses the potential impact of a time traveler arriving in a civilization that has not yet reached the Iron Age. The time traveler, who is not an expert in engineering or medicine, becomes a king and is asked about ways to help the development of the society. Some suggestions include introducing scientific methods, crop rotation, and fertilizer production. However, it is noted that simply telling the society about certain technologies is not enough, as the manufacturing techniques and knowledge of resources are also needed. It is suggested that the focus should be on instituting different practices and ways of thought, rather than introducing a random assortment of technology. The limitations and challenges of this scenario are also discussed, such as the need for a large organized society and access to
  • #1
GTOM
955
64
Lets suppose for a stroy, that a time traveller arrive in a civilization that hasnt reached iron age yet. He isn't a well qualified engineer or doctor, but he becomes a king.
How much he could help their development by simply telling : with really hot fire, you could produce iron, not just shape gold and cooper? By injecting weak microbes you could immunize yourselves against epidemics? You could build watermills?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Lewis Dartnell: The Knowledge - how to rebuild our world from scratch

The scenario considered in the book (>99% of the population suddenly dies, how to restart) is different, but many things apply to a time travel scenario as well.

You could probably help a lot, but the most important help would be "there is so much you can learn" and scientific methods.

The key point to making iron is not making a hot fire. It is the question how to make a hot fire, how to get the carbon content right, and so on. They don't know. Unless you happen to be an expert in medieval metallurgy, chances are good you don't know either. You would need groups of people working on it to see how you can do all these things. They don't produce much useful while doing research, so you first need enough surplus working time.

Crop rotation would be a very useful thing to introduce. That also needs some research what to rotate how, but it can improve food production a lot, and free time to work on iron and so on.

Some basic fertilizers can be made out of wood and other materials you might find in the environment.
GTOM said:
By injecting weak microbes you could immunize yourselves against epidemics?
I don't see how you could produce weak microbes in that environment, apart from the few cases where animal infections can help directly. But you can introduce the concept of germs and improve the sanitary standards.
 
  • Like
Likes GTOM
  • #3
Can you tell us more about this story? What's the plot, the limitations etc? It might work better if it's spread over multiple generations rather than one time traveling protagonist recreating the victorian era in mesopotamia.

GTOM said:
How much he could help their development by simply telling : with really hot fire, you could produce iron, not just shape gold and cooper? By injecting weak microbes you could immunize yourselves against epidemics? You could build watermills?

Do you know how to find iron? How to build a kiln? What about the pottery/ceramic tools needed? Do you know how to safely open a vein? How to source pathogens that won't kill you? Do you know how to shape stone? How to build pulleys, scaffold, wooden joints etc? It's not enough to know that a technology can work, if you don't know the manufacturing techniques (or even the manufacturing techniques for the tools to begin manufacture, or the tools for that etc.) You're probably just going to waste time and resources that an early agrarian society cannot afford.

You'd have to set your sights way, way lower than the industrial revolution. It may have been possible for it to happen earlier elsewhere (like in China) but it's not likely possible without a large organised society with access to plenty of natural resources and an economic system that can support engineers, scholars, students etc.

I agree with mfb that instituting different practices and ways of thought would be the focus over a random grab-bag of technology. Basic ideas of agriculture that give rise to a food surplus allowing for greater economic specialization would be an absolute must. followed by the adoption of the scientific method. But even beyond that you face the problem that natural resources are often very spread out. So you're going to need a way for your fledgling tribe to grow, explore, trade and maybe even conquer.
 
  • Like
Likes AidenFlamel
  • #4
Ryan_m_b said:
Can you tell us more about this story? What's the plot, the limitations etc? It might work better if it's spread over multiple generations rather than one time traveling protagonist recreating the victorian era in mesopotamia.
Do you know how to find iron? How to build a kiln? What about the pottery/ceramic tools needed? Do you know how to safely open a vein? How to source pathogens that won't kill you? Do you know how to shape stone? How to build pulleys, scaffold, wooden joints etc? It's not enough to know that a technology can work, if you don't know the manufacturing techniques (or even the manufacturing techniques for the tools to begin manufacture, or the tools for that etc.) You're probably just going to waste time and resources that an early agrarian society cannot afford.

You'd have to set your sights way, way lower than the industrial revolution. It may have been possible for it to happen earlier elsewhere (like in China) but it's not likely possible without a large organised society with access to plenty of natural resources and an economic system that can support engineers, scholars, students etc.

I agree with mfb that instituting different practices and ways of thought would be the focus over a random grab-bag of technology. Basic ideas of agriculture that give rise to a food surplus allowing for greater economic specialization would be an absolute must. followed by the adoption of the scientific method. But even beyond that you face the problem that natural resources are often very spread out. So you're going to need a way for your fledgling tribe to grow, explore, trade and maybe even conquer.

That society would be on the level to build pyramids so enough workforce, but not yet given up human sacrifice, and they won't unless a serious development happens, that would be the goal of the time traveller. That ancient society could already learn mining shape gold and cooper, maybe have experiments with bronze.
 
  • #5
GTOM said:
That society would be on the level to build pyramids so enough workforce, but not yet given up human sacrifice, and they won't unless a serious development happens, that would be the goal of the time traveller. That ancient society could already learn mining shape gold and cooper, maybe have experiments with bronze.

This kind of society still fits with the feedback so far. Unless the time traveller knows specifics he doesn't have a lot to teach the locals other than the fact that such things are (supposedly, they might not believe him) possible. Focusing on developing the economy to support an academic class is still the best strategy.

Incidentally the short story Adaptation by Mack Reynolds is concerned with a similar idea. It's an old story and is a very heavy handed poke at the cold war but it's quite interesting. The plot revolves around a spaceship sent from Earth in the far future to "modernise" two fallen colonies. One planet has recovered to a feudal city-state like status, the other to a level of technology akin to the Aztecs. The team has 50 years to develop both the planets by any means necessary.
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/24749/24749-h/24749-h.htm
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mfb
  • #6
Ryan_m_b said:
This kind of society still fits with the feedback so far. Unless the time traveller knows specifics he doesn't have a lot to teach the locals other than the fact that such things are (supposedly, they might not believe him) possible. Focusing on developing the economy to support an academic class is still the best strategy.

Incidentally the short story Adaptation by Mack Reynolds is concerned with a similar idea. It's an old story and is a very heavy handed poke at the cold war but it's quite interesting. The plot revolves around a spaceship sent from Earth in the far future to "modernise" two fallen colonies. One planet has recovered to a feudal city-state like status, the other to a level of technology akin to the Aztecs. The team has 50 years to develop both the planets by any means necessary.
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/24749/24749-h/24749-h.htm

Thanks i'll read it. :)
My story is pretty fluid now, maybe hostile time travellers also appear with proper equipment.
What is the minimal equipment, infrastructure needed to produce vaccination?
That one, and redirect manpower to experiment until they can build an iron smelter instead of a pyramid were a great start to development.
 
  • #7
I'm afraid there's no simple answer to that, it depends entirely on the disease. Take Ebola for example; despite a huge amount of research manhours and money over the past few decades (with a big peak in recent years) we still don't have one beyond the experimental stage. And that's with modern scientific equipment, international organisations, financial institutions etc. On the flip side various groups practiced inoculation against smallpox centuries ago. They simply rubbed scabs from someone with it into shallow cuts of someone without it:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variolation

Obviously modern methods are a lot better though. Beyond vaccines just an idea of germ theory and hygiene would be hugely helpful. If the traveller knew simple ways of making penicillin (IIRC it was first manufactured with mouldy bread in glass vessels) that would be drastically helpful too.
 
  • Like
Likes GTOM and AidenFlamel
  • #8
GTOM said:
Lets suppose for a stroy, that a time traveller arrive in a civilization that hasnt reached iron age yet. He isn't a well qualified engineer or doctor, but he becomes a king.
How much he could help their development by simply telling : with really hot fire, you could produce iron, not just shape gold and cooper? By injecting weak microbes you could immunize yourselves against epidemics? You could build watermills?
Have your read the Death World trilogy?
 
  • #9
Noisy Rhysling said:
Have your read the Death World trilogy?

No. But sounds interesting. :)
 
  • #10
For preventing disease, you probably can't do a lot of vaccination, apart from the easy stuff like cowpox for smallpox. I'd focus instead on quarantine, sanitation (you can't make a sanitation system, but you can probably get people to dump sewage downriver from where they wash and get drinking water), and treating wounds and infections with easy to access antiseptics like alcohol.
Other random thoughts of easy to implement modern techniques:
Rhythm method of birth control
Not using lead as eye shadow (this is something Egyptians did!) or other things that lead to lead exposure
Physical therapy for disabled people

You can actually find instruction booklets online aimed at people in rural areas of poor countries that tells them how to do low-tech medical treatment and therapy here. Those strategies would be extremely useful for your time traveler.
 
  • Like
Likes GTOM
  • #11
Probably the time traveller could help with sanitary systems? Savage shouldn't just flow on the streets of the cities, and clean the streets regularly?
Could they find some way to disinfect, clean drink water?
 
  • #12
Yes, as mentioned in post 2 and 3 already.

Filtering and boiling water is not perfect, but it reduces the risk of infections significantly.
 
  • Like
Likes GTOM
  • #13
I would think that the biggest impact a time traveler could have on an Iron Age culture is basic education. Simple mathematics, a written language, the concept of a legal system, animal husbandry, horticulture, etc., and then let the culture develop from there. They may not leap as far ahead as quickly as say giving them crop rotation, an aqueduct system, or steam powered engines, but they should still advance technologically by several hundred years over a much longer period of time. Assuming some catastrophe doesn't befall them creating the Atlantis myth. :wink:
 
  • #14
|Glitch| said:
Simple mathematics, a written language, the concept of a legal system, animal husbandry, horticulture
The Egyptians had all that in the Bronze Age already, and various other regions had that as well.
 
  • Like
Likes Ryan_m_b
  • #15
GTOM said:
Could they find some way to disinfect, clean drink water?
That's why beer was developed. The alcohol made it safe even if it was made from dirty water.
Not sure if beer is the humanity's biggest invention though... o:)
 
  • #16
I wonder about things that could help maintain time travellers might as king.
How hard would be to build siege and flaming weapons? Again setting is ancient Meso america.
(Well, speak about inventions, they didnt have wheel, but i doubt, that only because lack of invention. They didnt have oxes, horses, iron to reinforce wheels, incas had good roads, but mountain terrain, wheels practicality would have been seriously limited.)
 
  • #17
Good roads for animals: yes.
Good roads for wheels? You probably want stone roads for that. Stone stairs were used in very steep places, that is not very wheel-friendly either.

You can do a lot with better engineering and chemistry.
 
  • #18
SlowThinker said:
That's why beer was developed. The alcohol made it safe even if it was made from dirty water.
Not sure if beer is the humanity's biggest invention though... o:)
No, but storing it so that it's good for a year or a few might have been
 
  • #19
Reverse time travel is considered to be impossible.
Because it take more of whatever time is to go backwards than it does to go forward.
 
  • #20
rootone said:
Reverse time travel is considered to be impossible.
It's still an interesting exercise that makes you realize how little we actually know about all the technology we use every day.
 
  • #21
SlowThinker said:
That's why beer was developed. The alcohol made it safe even if it was made from dirty water.
Not sure if beer is the humanity's biggest invention though... o:)
It wasn't the alcohol that made it safe, but that you had to boil the water to make beer killing harmful bacteria that made it safe.
 
  • #22
I have a variation on GTOM's scenario, and the answer that comes to my mind is no; there is only so much a single individual can move an entire culture along.
 
  • #23
Khatti said:
I have a variation on GTOM's scenario, and the answer that comes to my mind is no; there is only so much a single individual can move an entire culture along.
How much?
 
  • #24
GTOM said:
How much?

In the case of my character he can't teach these primitives (Finnic and Germanic tribes in Scandinavia around 500 BC) how to build a starship--even though he's flown one. He knows the basics of how things like electricity works, but he's not hands on enough to build a generator or battery. He can provide them with the basics of math and language, and he can provide them with an alphabet, he can counsel these folks to keep their eyes open for Edisons and Einsteins, and he can set up a working government--but that's it.
 
  • #25
Khatti said:
and he can set up a working government
I see you're a sci-fi writer :DD
 
  • #26
SlowThinker said:
I see you're a sci-fi writer :DD

Well...this part takes a few hundred years to really get going. Toijopei actually sets up a theocracy, One of the tenants of that theocracy is reincarnation--which is why he/she can pull this off. Faith Babe, faith.
 
  • #27
Looking through my bookshelf I remembered another book that touches on this theme a bit: A Fire Upon the Deep by Vernor Vinge. One of the plots of the book concerns a spaceship that crashes on a primitive planet. The locals recover a child's computer and figure out how to operate it (it's designed for simple use to teach children which helps). After a while they find some economic development software on it. This software allows one to input their current wealth, technology and potential access to resources and receive a dynamic, customised plan for how to develop. E.g: "build a coal power station [click here for plans, if lacking in coal click here for alternatives]. Whilst it builds construct pylons to an industrial site [click here for pylon designs and here for more information on industrial site construction]"

It's a cool idea, essentially a gigantic wiki organised as a flow chart that provides multiple routes to a high tech economy based on starting conditions.
 

1. What was the Industrial Revolution before the Iron Age?

The Industrial Revolution before the Iron Age refers to the period of significant advancements in technology, manufacturing, and production that occurred in the 18th and 19th centuries. This was a time when human labor was gradually replaced by machines, leading to a major shift in the way goods were produced.

2. When did the Industrial Revolution before the Iron Age take place?

The Industrial Revolution before the Iron Age took place in the 18th and 19th centuries, starting in Britain and then spreading to other parts of Europe and the United States. It is considered to have begun in the mid-1700s and lasted until the mid-1800s.

3. What were the main inventions during the Industrial Revolution before the Iron Age?

Some of the main inventions during this time period include the steam engine, cotton gin, spinning jenny, power loom, and the telegraph. These inventions greatly increased productivity and efficiency in various industries, leading to the growth of factories and mass production.

4. How did the Industrial Revolution before the Iron Age impact society?

The Industrial Revolution had a major impact on society, bringing about significant changes in the way people lived and worked. It led to urbanization as people moved from rural areas to cities in search of work. It also created a new social class of factory owners and workers, and brought about advancements in transportation and communication.

5. What were the consequences of the Industrial Revolution before the Iron Age?

The Industrial Revolution had both positive and negative consequences. On one hand, it led to economic growth and improvements in living standards for some people. On the other hand, it also caused social and environmental problems, such as poor working conditions, pollution, and exploitation of workers. It also had long-term effects on global trade and the economy.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top