1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Inequalities 2

  1. Sep 30, 2008 #1
    i was wondering if i'm using the right approach for this
    the question reads
    is the following statement true for all x and y : 'If x<y then x^2<y^2'
    then it follows by asking about 'if x^2<y^2'

    i am currently using case analysis to do this
    by considering whether x and y are positive or negative
    is there any other more efficient way to do this ?

    what axiom should i use in this case ? because squaring both sides instead of multiplying by a common factor

  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 30, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Probably not. I assume x and y are supposed to be real numbers.
  4. Sep 30, 2008 #3
    so what would you suggest for me to prove these statements ?
    induction ?
  5. Sep 30, 2008 #4
    eg x=-2 y= -1
    then this statement will not hold
    but how should i put in down
  6. Sep 30, 2008 #5


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    For goodness sake, yes, do a "case analysis by considering whether x and y are positive or negative"!

    In particular, you should consider the case x= -4 and y= -3!

    Now, what do you by "if x^2< y^2"? If x^2< y^2, then what?
  7. Oct 1, 2008 #6
    If x and y are both positive, we have given x<y, so x^2<xy <y^2.
  8. Oct 1, 2008 #7
    you have the right answer.

    you disproved the statement by giving a counter example.

    "eg x=-2 y= -1
    then this statement will not hold
    but how should i put in down"

    first assume that the statement is true
    if x < y for all x,y implies that x^2 < y^2, then we have that (-2 < -1 implies that) 4 < 1
    but 4<1 is nonsense.

  9. Oct 2, 2008 #8
    this is what i came up with for the first part

    Assume that x<y is true , therefore x^n < y^n for n >0 is also true
    therefore x^2 < y^2 is true
    but the statement does not hold
    eg x = -4 y =-3

    should i put it down that way ? is that sufficient ?
  10. Oct 2, 2008 #9
    the second part says ' if x^2 > y^2 then x>y 0 ' . questions is whether it is true for all x and y

    again ... didn't i just prove that the statement for part does not hold
    so isn't it just copying the first part as my second part ?
  11. Oct 2, 2008 #10
    Um, then you can't say x^2 < y^y is true because it ISN'T. I don't think you should say a statement is true and then give a counterexample as to why it is not.

    You should consider different cases, such as when n is odd or even.
  12. Oct 2, 2008 #11
    how would then put in down ?
    because i assume that the statement is true
    then i recheck with the base statement

    isn't that's hwo we do it ?
  13. Oct 2, 2008 #12
    Hmm ok I see how the original question was posed. Well, can you be more general? I mean you've deduced that x = -4 and y = -3 would render the statement false. What about just considering -x and -y? How does this affect the inequality. There shouldn't be that much casework.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?