Infinite graph with finite area?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of extending the graph of a function to infinity in either direction while still having a finite area under the curve. Several examples are given, including the error function and the integral of e^(-x^2). The use of Fubini's theorem and polar coordinates is also mentioned. The conversation also touches on the calculation of integrals at infinity and the concept of Cauchy principal value.
  • #1
kreil
Insights Author
Gold Member
668
68
Is it possible for the graph of a function to extend to infinity in either direction but have a finite area under the curve?

It seems to me that since series exist that have infinite terms but are convergent, the same holds true here.

If so, does anyone have an example function I could play around with?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, of course. The function would have to go to 0, rapidly, in both directions. One important example is the "error function",
[tex]\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{-x^2}[/tex]
which has area under the curve of 1.
 
  • #3
How about [itex] e^{-kx} [/tex] with 'k" and "x" strictly positive,equivalently,"k" and "x" strictly negative ?

Daniel.
 
  • #4
dextercioby said:
How about [itex] e^{-kx} [/tex] with 'k" and "x" strictly positive,equivalently,"k" and "x" strictly negative ?

Daniel.


|kx| you mean?
 
  • #5
If you prefer,i was referring to this integral

[tex]\int_{0}^{+\infty} e^{-kx} dx [/tex]

,k>0.

Then it occurred to me that
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{0} e^{-kx} dx [/tex]

k<0

is the same thing...

Daniel.

P.S.I don't like modulus under the integral sign... :yuck:
 
  • #6
[tex]\int \limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{1+x^2}[/tex]

Easily integrated with a beautiful result.
This is one of my favourite integrals... (boy, that sounded nerdish).
 
  • #7
Thanks for all the equations

Would someone take the time to show me the algebra for

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}(\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{-x^2})dx=1[/tex]

I don't know how to solve integrals at infinity, the only thing I know how to use to evaluate integrals right now is the fundamental theorem (I'm a high school senior in AP calc AB, but I plan to be a math major).
 
  • #8
OMG,i saw it just now...HALLS,what did u do?? Where is the square root?And where did that 2 come from??

Daniel.

P.S.O.P.1-st question:Do you know Fubini's theorem??If u don't,are u willing to accept that the product of 2 improper integrals on R is equivalent with a double improper integral on R^{2}??
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Integrals at infinity are defined by a limit, just like sequences or series.
Similarly, if the integral limit exists, the integral is called convergent.

[tex]\int_a^{\infty}f(x)dx=\lim_{t \to \infty} \int_a^t f(x)dx[/tex].

For [itex]\int \limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}\exp(-x^2)dx[/itex] you need a little trick which uses a double integral.
 
  • #10
dextercioby said:
OMG,i saw it just now...HALLS,what did u do?? Where is the square root?And where did that 2 come from??

Daniel.

P.S.O.P.1-st question:Do you know Fubini's theorem??If u don't,are u willing to accept that the product of 2 improper integrals on R is equivalent with a double improper integral on R^{2}??


come on! 2pi=1, so root(2pi)=2pi

The OP says he only knows the fundamental theorem of calc so I'm guessing fubini's theorem is not on the syllabus.

For the OP. It can't be done by the elementary means he knows, since it isn't an elementary integral, ie the integrand isn't the derivative of something nice.
 
  • #11
Okay,Matt,how about the DEFINITION OF ERF? :wink: Or is that the trully "relative" thing...??

Daniel.

EDIT:That should be actually:

[tex] 2\pi\cdot n\cdot i =1 ;n\in Z^{*} [/tex]

:tongue2: :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #12
matt grime said:
come on! 2pi=1, so root(2pi)=2pi

Isn't it actually [itex]2\pi i[/tex] that's actually 1 ? :rofl:

EDIT : it's actually zero, d'oh ! :yuck:
 
Last edited:
  • #13
If 2pi were 1 then no one would make a mistake in Fourier series again... apart from the other mistakes that is.
 
  • #14
matt grime said:
come on! 2pi=1, so root(2pi)=2pi

I'll have to remember that! Yes, I dropped the square root.

kreil: to integrat [itex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2}dx[/itex], first write
[itex]I= \int_{-\inty}^\infty e^{-x^2}dx[/itex]. Because of the symmetry,
[itex]\frac{I}{2}= \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2}dx[/itex]. It is also true that [itex]\frac{I}{2}= \int_0^\infty e^{-y^2}dy[/itex] since that's just a change in dummy variable.

Multiply the two together: [itex]\frac{I^2}{4}= \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2}dx \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2}dx[/itex]. Fubini's theorm, that dextercioby referred to, basically says that that product is the same as the double or repeated integral (which Fubini's theorem also says are the same) [itex]\int_{x=0}^{\infty}\int_{y=0}^{\infty}e^{-(x^2+ y^2)} dydx[/itex]. Think of that as an integral over the first quadrant in the xy-plane and convert to polar coordinates: x2+ y[/sup]2[/sup] becomes r2 and dydx become r dr dθ. See that "r" in the differential? That's the trick that makes this possible!
In order to cover the first quadrant r must go from 0 to [itex]\infty[/itex] and θ from 0 to [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex]. In polar coordinates, we have [itex]\frac{I^2}{4}= \int_{\theta=0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\int_{r=0}{\infty}e^{-r^2}rdrd\theta[/itex].

Since there is no θ in the integrand, we have immediately [itex]\frac{I^2}{4}= \frac{\pi}{2}\int_{r=0}^{\infty}re^{-r^2}dr[/itex].

Let u= r2. Then du= 2rdr so rdr= du/2 (see why we needed that "r"?). Of course, when r=0,u= 0 and when t= [itex]\infty[/itex], so does u. In terms of the variable u, [itex]\frac{I^2}{4}= \frac{\pi}{4}\int_{u=0}^{\infty}e^{-u}du[/itex]. That's easy to integrate and we have [itex]\frac{I^2}{4}= \frac{\pi}{4}[/itex] so [itex]I^2= \frac{\pi}[/itex] and [itex]I= \sqrt{\pi}[/itex].

I forgot the square root, as several people pointed out!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
How about [tex]\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty} x dx[/tex]
 
  • #16
danne89 said:
How about [tex]\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty} x dx[/tex]
You can use the basic definition of the improper integral over the reals as a limit to show that this expression diverges (represents no value in the reals).
 
  • #17
danne89 said:
How about [tex]\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty} x dx[/tex]
That's an interesting case.

[tex]\lim_{\epsilon_{1,2} \to _{\pm}\infty}\int_{\epsilon_1}^{\epsilon_2}xdx=\frac{1}{2}\lim_{\epsilon_{1,2} \to _{\pm}\infty}\left(\epsilon_2^2-\epsilon_1^2\right)[/tex]

The limit doesn't exist if [itex]\epsilon_1[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_2[/itex] approach infinity in an arbitrary manner.

But if [itex]\epsilon_1=\epsilon_2=\epsilon[/itex]:

[tex]\lim_{\epsilon \to \infty}\int_{-\epsilon}^{+\epsilon}xdx[/tex]
does exist.
It's called the Cauchy principal value of the improper integral.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Just read all the posts, got stuck with detention for being late to school, lots of information to work on...

Galileo-


Integrals at infinity are defined by a limit, just like sequences or series.
Similarly, if the integral limit exists, the integral is called convergent.

[tex]\int_a^{\infty}f(x)dx=\lim_{t \to \infty} \int_a^t f(x)dx[/tex]

If you could give me a simple example I would be able to fully grasp this.



Thank you halls of ivy for showing that to me, I will have to work on it a bit.
 
  • #19
Okay. A very simple case:

[tex]\int_{1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^2}dx=\lim_{t \to \infty} \int_1^t\frac{1}{x^2}dx=\lim_{t \to \infty}\left(-\frac{1}{x}\right]^t_1=\lim_{t \to \infty}\left(1-\frac{1}{t}\right)=1[/tex]

Another one, using [itex]\frac{d}{dx}\arctan(x)=\frac{1}{1+x^2}[/itex]:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{1+x^2}dx=2 \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{1+x^2}dx=2\lim_{t \to \infty} (\arctan(t)-\arctan(0))=\pi[/tex]
 
  • #20
I think Gabriel's Horn ties in nicely in this discussion. For those who don't know, it is the shape generated for the revolution of 1/x around the x-axis for x>= 1. In doing the improper integrals, it has a finite volume of pi, but an infinite surface area. Blows my mind.
 
  • #21
Good one...Congratulations! :smile: You managed to find the simplest possible...

Daniel.

P.S.That's a reply to post No.15.
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Galileo said:
That's an interesting case.

[tex]\lim_{\epsilon_{1,2} \to _{\pm}\infty}\int_{\epsilon_1}^{\epsilon_2}xdx=\frac{1}{2}\lim_{\epsilon_{1,2} \to _{\pm}\infty}\left(\epsilon_2^2-\epsilon_1^2\right)[/tex]

The limit doesn't exist if [itex]\epsilon_1[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_2[/itex] approach infinity in an arbitrary manner.

But if [itex]\epsilon_1=\epsilon_2=\epsilon[/itex]:

[tex]\lim_{\epsilon \to \infty}\int_{-\epsilon}^{+\epsilon}xdx[/tex]
does exist.
It's called the Cauchy principal value of the improper integral.

What about this one,Galileo:
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x \ dx= 0 [/tex]

,as the integration of an odd function over an interval symmetric wrt the origin?


Daniel.

P.S.Are u sure that "a=-a" implies "a=0"??If you are,then u'll understand my arguments...
 
  • #23
dextercioby said:
What about this one,Galileo:
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x \ dx= 0 [/tex]

,as the integration of an odd function over an interval symmetric wrt the origin?


Daniel.

P.S.Are u sure that "a=-a" implies "a=0"??If you are,then u'll understand my arguments...

Sorry, I don't see what you're hinting at.

And yes, ofcourse a=-a implies a=0.

BTW: One question mark will suffice. :smile:
 
  • #24
What di u mean u don't see?

II gave a reason why that integral is zero:it's an integral from an odd function on a symmetric interval wrt the origin x=0.

Daniel.
 
  • #25
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}xdx=2\lim_{t\rightarrow{\infty}}\int_0^{t}xdx[/tex]

[tex]=2\lim_{t\rightarrow{\infty}}1 ]_0^t=2(1-1)=0[/tex]

figured I would take that chance to practice the formula galileo showed me
 
  • #26
That's wrong,the function "x" is odd.U cannot split the interval into 2,because the function is not even...

Daniel.
 
  • #27
And the primitive/antiderivative,is not one,but x^2/2.

Daniel.
 
  • #29
dextercioby said:
What di u mean u don't see?

II gave a reason why that integral is zero:it's an integral from an odd function on a symmetric interval wrt the origin x=0.

Daniel.

Yes, which means

[tex]\int_{-a}^{+a} xdx=0[/tex]
for all [itex]a\in \mathbb{R}[/itex].
It does not follow that:

[tex]\int \limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty} xdx=0[/tex]

Since you are dealing with 2 limits:
[tex] \lim_{N_1 \to -\infty} \lim_{N_2 \to +\infty} \int \limits_{N_1}^{N_2} xdx=\frac{1}{2}\lim_{N_1 \to -\infty} \lim_{N_2 \to +\infty}\left(N_2^2-N_1^2\right)[/tex]

This limit clearly doesn't exist. Therefore [itex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} xdx[/itex] is undefined.

What you are referring to is the following integral:

[tex] \lim_{N \to \infty} \int \limits_{-N}^{+N} xdx[/tex]
which does equal 0. But this improper integral where the limits approach infinity in a nice symmetrical manner is called the Cauchy Principal value of the improper integral. So you see there is some subtlety involved.
 
Last edited:
  • #30
Ahh. A little to advance for me. Isn't infinity a member of the reals?
 
  • #31
Nope, it's not.
 
  • #32
The reals are composed of numbers, infinity is not a number but rather a concept
 

1. What is an infinite graph with finite area?

An infinite graph with finite area is a mathematical concept that describes a graph (a set of vertices and edges) that is infinite in size, but can still be contained within a finite area or bounded region. This means that the graph has no endpoints or boundaries, but its vertices and edges are still limited to a specific region.

2. How is an infinite graph with finite area different from a finite graph?

An infinite graph with finite area is different from a finite graph in that it has an infinite number of vertices and edges, whereas a finite graph has a limited number of vertices and edges. Additionally, a finite graph has boundaries or endpoints, while an infinite graph with finite area does not.

3. Are there real-world applications for infinite graphs with finite area?

Yes, there are several real-world applications for infinite graphs with finite area. One example is in network routing, where the graph represents the connections between different nodes. Another example is in physics, where these graphs can be used to model the behavior of particles in an infinite space.

4. How are infinite graphs with finite area studied and analyzed?

Infinite graphs with finite area are studied and analyzed using various mathematical techniques, such as graph theory, topology, and geometry. These techniques help to understand the properties and behavior of these graphs, as well as their applications in different fields.

5. Can an infinite graph with finite area ever be drawn or visualized?

No, an infinite graph with finite area cannot be drawn or visualized in its entirety. However, it can be represented or approximated by drawing a portion of the graph within a bounded region. This representation can help in understanding the overall structure and properties of the graph.

Similar threads

  • General Math
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
76
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
66
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
408
Replies
7
Views
979
Replies
11
Views
800
Replies
10
Views
821
Back
Top