- 12

- 0

## Main Question or Discussion Point

**[SOLVED] infinite set of coprimes**

does any one know an infinite set of coprimes except for the elements of sylvester's sequence. S(n)=S(n-1)*(S(n-1)-1)+1, with s(0)=2

- Thread starter kureta
- Start date

- 12

- 0

does any one know an infinite set of coprimes except for the elements of sylvester's sequence. S(n)=S(n-1)*(S(n-1)-1)+1, with s(0)=2

- 365

- 1

The primes, maybe? :P

- 12

- 0

yes. thanks but... well... nevermind

CRGreathouse

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 2,817

- 0

The primes = 1 mod 4? The noncomposites? {2*3, 5*7, 11*13, 17*19, ...}?

- 12

- 0

does any one know such a set AND its defining formula which gives us the nth term.

CRGreathouse

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 2,817

- 0

The primes have many defining formulas, a fair number of which use only basic operations (say, addition, multiplication, factorials, and sine). To what end do you want this?does any one know such a set AND its defining formula which gives us the nth term.

matt grime

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 9,394

- 3

Note 2^n - 1 = 2*(2^{n-1} -1) + 1, proving that they are coprime.

- 12

- 0

2^2-1=3 and 2^4-1=15 and 15/3=5 so they are not all coprimes am i wrong?

matt grime

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 9,394

- 3

- 841

- 0

a(n) = 5*2^(2n) +5*2^n + 1 is my guess. Prove or disprovedoes any one know such a set AND its defining formula which gives us the nth term.

One thing that is certain, they can only be divisible by a prime ending in 1 or 9

- 841

- 0

Forget this too, If n = 8 2^n equals 9 and 2^2n = 4 mod 11.a(n) = 5*2^(2n) +5*2^n + 1 is my guess. Prove or disprove

One thing that is certain, they can only be divisible by a prime ending in 1 or 9

5*(4+9) + 1 = 66. also there are other powers of 2 with the same residue mod 11 so those values for n give a(n) which are not coprime.

Maybe take n to be prime for the n in a(n) or something similar.

- 12

- 0

ramsey2879 your reply was the kind that i was looking for. thanks. but taking n to be prime makes this formula useless for me. because my purpose is to find a set of coprimes generated by a simple function . and you should see "a different approach to primes" thread for the reason of my asking for such a set.

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 7K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 29

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K