1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Infinity times zero equals pi

  1. Jun 5, 2009 #1
    I'm 16 and in high school. I've never taken physics or anything before.

    I have this equation that shows that pi = infinity times zero


    So if u take a circle with a diameter of 1 and draw equal spaced radius' and connect them you get a polygon with all equal sides.

    the more radius' you draw the more sides the polygon has and the closer the perimeter gets to pi

    the formula for the perimeters of these polygons is:


    where n is the number of sides of the polygon

    as n gets larger and larger in this equation it approaches pi. Like if you make n = 1000 you get the first 5 digits of pi correct.

    we can say then that:

    infinity(-.5(cos(360/infinity)-1))^.5 = pi

    360/infinty = 0 and cos(0) = 1

    so this simplifies to...

    infinity(-.5(1-1))^.5 = infinity(-.5(0)^.5) = infinity(0)

    so therefore

    infinity(0) = pi

    my calculater says infinity(0) is undefined so i don't get it.

    How am i wrong?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 5, 2009 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Your calculator is right. Infinity multiplied by zero is NOT defined. Infinity is not a number. You can't just plug it into the equation. If you took the LIMIT of the equation as n approached infinity (which is a statement that should be taken to mean, "as n increases without bound*"), then perhaps you might be able to show that the result equalled pi. Do you know what limits are? If not, you will learn about them in your first calculus course.

    EDIT: to summarize: if you carry out meaningless operations, you will get meaningless results.

    EDIT 2:

    * For clarity, this does not mean that n will eventually reach some destination (final value). What it means is that you can make the expression *arbitrarily* close to pi by making n arbitrarily large. Here, "arbitrarily close to pi" should be taken to mean "as close to pi as you like." This is what we mean when we say that the expression has a "value", in the "limit as n goes to infinity."
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2009
  4. Jun 5, 2009 #3
    There are lots of things wrong with your calculation. You need to remember that infinity is not a number, and anything times infinity is not well defined. Infinity only exists in limits, eg you can take the limit of x to infinity.

    It is true that your formula converges to pi in the limit that n goes to infinity. However, taking a limit is not the same as simply substituting "n = infinity".

    360/infinity is NOT zero. 360/n is zero in the limit that n goes to infinity. There's a difference!
  5. Jun 5, 2009 #4
    ok thank you.

    so you cant use infinity like a number that makes sense i guess. Haven't learned about limits, but yea i think i get the idea...
  6. Jun 5, 2009 #5


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Well, I guess you just discovered limits for yourself ;-) Time to feel smart! Seriously though, when you do learn about limits in class, some of what you hear will sound pretty familiar.
  7. Jun 6, 2009 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    One reason why we don't just say 'infinity times 0 equals..." is that it is possible to find other functions f(x)*g(x) where f(x) goes to infinity, g(x) goes to 0, but f(x)*g(x) goes to some other number. By choosing f and g carefully, we can make the limit of that product anything.
  8. Jun 6, 2009 #7
    What is wrong with this calculation for the value of e?

    e = Limn->infinity(1 + 1/n)n

    so e = (1+ 1/infinity)infinity = 1infinity
  9. Jun 6, 2009 #8


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Because the conclusion of the limit theorems only apply when you don't have an indeterminate form.
  10. Jun 6, 2009 #9
    Please note, as I've said before, that
    [tex]\displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x^n[/tex]

    is NOT the same as

Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook