1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Initial Angular Acceleration

  1. Jan 1, 2006 #1
    A rod of length 2.4 m is pivoted at its center and masses of 2.3 kg and 3.1 kg are hung from its two ends. Find the initial angular acceleration of the rod when the system is released from a starting position of the rod that is horizontal.

    The radius of the rod would be r=1/2(2.4).. which is 1.2.

    Should I use the equation I=mr^2 or I=1/12ml^2? I=mr^2 is I=(2.3)(1.2)^2=3.312 and I=(3.1)(1.2)^2=4.464. I=1/12ml^2 is I=1/12(2.3)(2.4)^2=1.104 and I=1/12(3.1)(2.4)^2=1.488. Do i even need these for this problem?

    Where do i go next?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 1, 2006 #2

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Use Newton's 2nd law for rotational motion: [tex]\tau = I \alpha[/tex], where I is the total rotational inertia.

    What's the mass of the rod?
  4. Jan 1, 2006 #3
    I=(2.3)(1.2)^2= 3.312
    I=(3.1)(1.2)^2= 4.464

    3.312+4.464= 7.776. = I..

    is this right so far?
  5. Jan 1, 2006 #4
    Is the rod assumed to be massless? It looks like you are on the right track, and now find the torque. I'd suggest, this time, doing all the algebra before you put in the numbers.
  6. Jan 2, 2006 #5
    The problem doesn't state the mass of the rod, just the masses on both ends.
    How do i find the torque if i've only got the inertia?
  7. Jan 2, 2006 #6

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    The torque is caused by the weight of the hanging masses. Use the usual formula for finding torque.
  8. Jan 2, 2006 #7
    Yeah, the usual formula of [tex]\tau_\textit{net} = FR_1 + FR_2[/tex] where the force would be the force of gravity and r the distance from the pivot to the perpindicular force (half the length of the rod).
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2006
  9. Jan 2, 2006 #8
    so Tnet = (9.8 x 2.3)(1.2)+(9.8 x 3.1)(1.2)?

    Last edited: Jan 2, 2006
  10. Jan 2, 2006 #9

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    One torque is clockwise; one counter-clockwise. They have different signs.
  11. Jan 2, 2006 #10
    so [tex]\tau_\textit{net} = FR_1 + FR_2[/tex] was not right?
  12. Jan 2, 2006 #11
    Yes, but you need to change the signs:

    [tex]\tau_\textit{net} = F_1R_1 - F_2R_2[/tex]

    You have to subtract the torque caused by the lesser mass because it works in the opposite direction (like Doc said).

    I added the subscripts to F because they're two different forces.
  13. Jan 2, 2006 #12
    Tnet = (9.8 x 3.1)(1.2)-(9.8 x 2.3)(1.2)= 9.408? What's next?

    [tex]\tau = I \alpha[/tex]

    [tex]\ 9.408=7.776\alpha[/tex] ??
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2006
  14. Jan 2, 2006 #13
    Well, yeah, it was plus a negative torque, which you could just write as minus.

    Yes, that should give the right answer when you divide.
  15. Jan 2, 2006 #14
    angular acceleration= 1.2 rad/s^2
  16. Jan 2, 2006 #15
    Yeah, depending on what convention they wanted you to use for positive or negative torque then the sign will be different. But, it doesn't look like they ever told you what weight was on which end, so you are probably fine.
  17. Jan 2, 2006 #16
    ok, thanks for the help, I appreciate it much.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Initial Angular Acceleration
  1. Initial Acceleration (Replies: 35)

  2. Initial Acceleration? (Replies: 4)

  3. Initial acceleration (Replies: 2)

  4. Angular acceleration! (Replies: 2)