Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Initial data/Cauchy problem

  1. Dec 15, 2011 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Show that [itex]R_{00}= -\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\alpha\beta,00}+ M_{00}[/itex], where M can be expressed solely in terms of the initial data, which is the metric tensor and its first derivatives.

    2. Relevant equations
    [itex]R_{ab}= R^c_{acb}= \Gamma^a_{bd,c}- \Gamma^a_{bc,d}[/itex] in geodesic coordinates
    [itex]\Gamma^a_{bc}= \frac{1}{2}g^{ad}(g_{dc,b}+ g_{db,c}- g_{bc,d})[/itex]

    3. The attempt at a solution
    [itex]R_{00}= R^a_{0a0}= \Gamma^a_{00,a}- \Gamma^a_{0a,0}[/itex]
    [itex]R_{00}= (g_{b0,0}- \frac{1}{2}g_{00,b})g^{ab}_{,a}+ g^{ab}g_{b0,a0}- \frac{1}{2}g^{ab}g_{00,ab}- \frac{1}{2}(g_{ba,0}+ g_{b0,a}- g_0a,b)g^{ab}_{,0}- \frac{1}{2}g^{ab}g_{ba,00}- \frac{1}{2}g^{ab}g_{b0,0a}+ \frac{1}{2}g^{ab}g_{0a,0b}[/itex]
    a and b are summations from 0 to 3, while [itex]\alpha[/itex] and [itex]\beta[/itex] are summations for space coordinates, so they are 1 to 3. Since the one second-derivative term in the expression I am trying to reach is summed over the space coordinates, I need to split one of the terms above. I split [itex]-\frac{1}{2}g^{ab}g_{ba,00}= -\frac{1}{2}(g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta\alpha,00}+ g^{a0}g_{0a,00}+ g^{0\beta}g_{\beta0,00})[/itex].
    So I define [itex]M_{00}= (g_{b0,0}- \frac{1}{2}g_{00,b})g^{ab}_{,a}- \frac{1}{2}(g_{ba,0}+ g_{b0,a}- g_0a,b)g^{ab}_{,0}[/itex], as all the rest of the terms have second derivatives of the metric tensor, which are not in the initial data.
    [itex]R_{00}= -\frac{1}{2}(g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta\alpha,00}+ g^{a0}g_{0a,00}+ g^{0\beta}g_{\beta0,00}- g^{ab}g_{b0,a0}+ g^{ab}g_{00,ab}- g^{ab}g_{0a,0b})+ M_{00}[/itex]
    So now I have to show that [itex]-\frac{1}{2}(g^{a0}g_{0a,00}+ g^{0\beta}g_{\beta0,00}- g^{ab}g_{b0,a0}+ g^{ab}g_{00,ab}- g^{ab}g_{0a,0b})=0[/itex]
    I have simplified those five terms down to three: [itex]\frac{1}{2}(g^{a\beta}g_{0a,0\beta}- g^{a\beta}g_{00,a\beta}+ g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta0,\alpha0})[/itex]
    I do not know how to simplify that any further. Can someone help?
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2011
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 21, 2011 #2
    I've got it simplified to [itex]R_{00}= -\frac{1}{2}(g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta\alpha,00}- g^{\alpha\beta}g_{0\alpha,0\beta}+ g^{\alpha\beta}g_{00,\alpha\beta}- g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta0,\alpha0})+ M_{00}[/itex], but I still have not figured out what to do about those three extra terms. Will anybody help, please?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook