Initial EH in Collapsing Star

  • Thread starter anorlunda
  • Start date
  • #1
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
8,856
5,754
I was reading Stephen Hawking offers new resolution of black hole paradox. Most is over my head but when he mentions particles falling in through the EH, it raises a question.

When a BH is created in a collapsing star, does the EH first appear at zero radius and grow outward, or does the EH first appear with non-zero radius? In the latter case, there would be some stellar mass captured inside that never did fall in through the EH.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,981
385
does the EH first appear at zero radius and grow outward, or does the EH first appear with non-zero radius?
The latter.
 
  • #3
mathman
Science Advisor
7,876
452
The event horizon is defined by the mass of the star. Once the collapsing star radius is smaller than the event horizon radius, it is a black hole.
 
  • #4
1,981
385
The event horizon is defined by the mass of the star. Once the collapsing star radius is smaller than the event horizon radius, it is a black hole.
It is not that easy (even without rotation) because the event horizon appears inside the collapsing star.
 
  • #5
748
41
When a BH is created in a collapsing star, does the EH first appear at zero radius and grow outward, or does the EH first appear with non-zero radius? In the latter case, there would be some stellar mass captured inside that never did fall in through the EH.
You might find this link useful- http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/bh-st.html
 
  • #6
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
8,856
5,754
Thanks for the replies. But now I don't understand how Hawking can say that a hologram at the event horizon resolves the information paradox.

The Information Paradox for Black Holes
S. W. Hawking
http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.01147

Hawking's reasoning seems to apply only to particles that fell in through the EH. It would not address the information of mass trapped inside during stellar collapse which never did cross the EH.
 
  • #7
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
741
Since the minimum mass necessary to form a black hole is the Planck mass, it appears safe to deduce all black holes begin with a non zero radius. I would expect them to grow rapidly, and possibly frenetically, from that point forward depending on the infall rate. I have no clue how you might go about calculating a minimum, or maximum infall rates. Given the smallest known black hole is about 5 solar masses, that is a pretty sizable discrepancy between any theoretical minimum and the observed minimum. I doubt many theorists have enough knowledge of condensed matter physics and happen to be maschistic enough to try and reconstruct a black hole from the ground up.
 

Related Threads on Initial EH in Collapsing Star

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
17K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
955
Top