Hi!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Define an integral operator K: L^2 (0,1) -> L^2(0,1) by:

Kx(t) = Integral[ (1+ts)exp(ts)x(s) ds from t=0 to t=1].

Why is "obvious" that K is a one-to-one operator?

I know K is one to one if Kx(t) = 0 implies x(t) = 0 but I don't see why this is true. Can you please explain why?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Injective operator in L^2(0,1)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Injective operator | Date |
---|---|

A Angular Moment Operator Vector Identity Question | Feb 10, 2018 |

A Differential operator, inverse thereof | Jan 9, 2018 |

I Fredholm integral equation with separable kernel | Jul 9, 2017 |

I Do limit and differential operators commute? | Feb 16, 2017 |

Injective function | May 14, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**