I'm working some homework where we're introduced to inner automorphisms. I have that G is a group. Given a fixed g in G, and f(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); _{g}:G → G, f_{g}(x)= gxg^{-1}.

I'm just a little confused about the notation. Are both g and x in G? I've been reading through the wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner_automorphism and that seems to be the case, however when I'm working on proofs I wasn't sure which variable I was supposed to be working with.

For instance, if I'm proving surjectivity, (or injectivity or bijectivity) I would want to show f(x_{1})=f(x_{2}), however I would assume g stays fixed, correct? But when I'm proving f has an inverse, I would prove that (f_{g})^{-1}=f_{g-1}, which is using a different fixed g in G? Similarly, The wiki says that when G is abelian, the inner automorphism contains only the identity, but if I wanted to prove that, would I work with two different g's or two different x's?

I have a vague idea of how this relates to permutations, but it's not sinking in and my hang ups about the notation is preventing me from understanding a lot of what I'm reading. f is a permutation function? Or is G a set of permutations? Actually, now I'm confusing myself even worse. Could someone clarify for me?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Inner Automorphism

Loading...

Similar Threads - Inner Automorphism | Date |
---|---|

I Inner product, dot product? | Aug 24, 2017 |

If F is inner automorphism , what does this mean ? | Dec 10, 2012 |

Extending automorphism groups to inner automorphism groups. | Jun 24, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**