I'm working some homework where we're introduced to inner automorphisms. I have that G is a group. Given a fixed g in G, and f(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); _{g}:G → G, f_{g}(x)= gxg^{-1}.

I'm just a little confused about the notation. Are both g and x in G? I've been reading through the wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner_automorphism and that seems to be the case, however when I'm working on proofs I wasn't sure which variable I was supposed to be working with.

For instance, if I'm proving surjectivity, (or injectivity or bijectivity) I would want to show f(x_{1})=f(x_{2}), however I would assume g stays fixed, correct? But when I'm proving f has an inverse, I would prove that (f_{g})^{-1}=f_{g-1}, which is using a different fixed g in G? Similarly, The wiki says that when G is abelian, the inner automorphism contains only the identity, but if I wanted to prove that, would I work with two different g's or two different x's?

I have a vague idea of how this relates to permutations, but it's not sinking in and my hang ups about the notation is preventing me from understanding a lot of what I'm reading. f is a permutation function? Or is G a set of permutations? Actually, now I'm confusing myself even worse. Could someone clarify for me?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Inner Automorphism

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**