1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Inner product proof

  1. Nov 11, 2009 #1
    Let V be an inner product space, and let W be a finite-dimensional subspace of V. If x[tex]\notin[/tex] W, prove that there exists y[tex]\in[/tex] V such that y [tex]\in[/tex] W(perp), but <x,y>[tex]\neq[/tex] 0.

    I don't have a clue....
    Thanks
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 11, 2009 #2

    lanedance

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    you could start by using something along the lines of gram-schmidt to decompose to x into a sum of vector from W & one from W perp...
     
  4. Nov 12, 2009 #3
    Umm..I dont really get it. Can you explain more specifically? Thank you.
     
  5. Nov 12, 2009 #4

    lanedance

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    what don't you get?

    first you need to assume x is non-zero

    x is not contained in W, and as its non-zero, this means it must have a component in W perp , (as V = W + W perp by defintion of W perp, sloppy notation here, but hopefully you get the idea)

    now consider the dot product of x with the component of x in W perp
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Inner product proof
  1. Inner product proof (Replies: 33)

Loading...