Why are inspectors general coming under attack?

In summary: But the board never took any formal action against West.Inspector General Kirt West rankled top managers of the federal legal aid program for the poor when he investigated lavish executive expenditures. The agency's board of directors discussed firing him in early 2006.According to my local paper's version of the story there has been no inspector general for the pentagon for over a year. These guys were apparently finding a bit too much waste and corruption in government agencies. This should be front page news.
  • #1
edward
62
166
This was in my local paper. I had to dig a bit to come up with a link to the info. It seems to me that this should be front page news. These guys were apparently finding a bit too much waste and corruption in government agencies.

According to my local paper's version of the story there has been no inspector general for the pentagon for over a year.


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The inspectors general entrusted to unearth waste, fraud and abuse in federal agencies are increasingly under attack, as top government officials they scrutinize try to erode the watchdogs' independence and authority.

During 2006, several inspectors general felt the wrath of government bosses or their supporters in Congress after investigations cited agencies for poor performance, excessive spending or wasted money.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/W/WATCHDOGS_UNDER_FIRE?SITE=MTBIL&SECTION=TOP_STORIES&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
See if you find this story in the front page news: http://www.cq.com/public/20061103approps.html

Last month’s mass firing of House Appropriations Committee investigators followed years of declining appetite for tough oversight and partisan squabbles that the investigators say often stalled their work.

Several members of the team, some of whom spoke on the condition that they not be identified by name, defend their record against committee spokesman John Scofield’s charge that recent work was not good. They suggest instead that majority Republicans had no appetite for oversight of the Bush administration.

The investigators said they identified billions of dollars in potential savings every year, particularly in the Defense budget, and that they heard no complaints until Chairman Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., dismissed 60 contractors on Oct. 16.
That's about as many as there were! Lewis quite simply dissolved the entire oversight team.

This, of course, is the same Jerry Lewis who is currently under investigation by the Justice Dept (see his wiki).
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Gokul43201 said:
See if you find this story in the front page news: http://www.cq.com/public/20061103approps.html

That's about as many as there were! Lewis quite simply dissolved the entire oversight team.

This, of course, is the same Jerry Lewis who is currently under investigation by the Justice Dept (see his wiki).

Great link. It applied to the appropriations committe. This is the type of thing that is going on with all government agencies. There are a lot of smaller agencies that are headed by high roller political appointees and they also are trying to get rid of oversite.

Legal Services Corp. Inspector General Kirt West rankled top managers of the federal legal aid program for the poor when he investigated lavish executive expenditures. The agency's board of directors discussed firing him in early 2006.

West "should know that he's got to ... shape up or we will ship him out," board vice chairman Lillian BeVier said, according to one meeting transcript.
 

What is the role of an inspector general?

An inspector general is an independent oversight official responsible for investigating and auditing government agencies to ensure they are operating efficiently and ethically. They also serve as a liaison between the government and the public, providing transparency and accountability.

Why are inspectors general sometimes under fire?

Inspectors general may come under fire when they uncover misconduct or wrongdoing within government agencies, which can lead to pushback from those being investigated. They may also face criticism for not being independent enough or for their handling of certain investigations.

How are inspectors general appointed?

Inspectors general are typically appointed by the President or the head of their respective agency. They must be approved by the Senate and are required to have a background in auditing, law enforcement, or a related field.

What is the process for investigating complaints against inspectors general?

Complaints against inspectors general can be filed with the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE). The CIGIE will then review the complaint and determine if an investigation is warranted. If an investigation is launched, it will be conducted by a different inspector general to ensure impartiality.

How do inspectors general ensure their independence?

To maintain their independence, inspectors general are required to report directly to the head of their agency and are not subject to supervision by other officials. They are also protected from being fired without cause and have the authority to access all necessary information and documents for their investigations.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top