Hello..that's my question today..why can't we obtain [tex] \pi(x) [/tex] by solving the integral equation obtained from Euler's product:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] \frac{log \zeta(s)}{s}= \int_{2}^{\infty}dx \frac{ \pi(x)}{x(x^{s}-1)} [/tex] ?

- Of course we can't solve it "Analytically" (or perhaps yes, i will take a look to "Numerical Recipes"...:grumpy: ) but we could solve it Numerically using some quadrature method for the Integral equation..or introducing the term inside the Kernel:

[tex] \pi(s) = \int_{2}^{\infty} \pi(x) \delta (x-s) [/tex] so the integral becomes a "Fredholm Integral Equation of Second Kind".... I know that an algorithm (either numerical or similar) must exist to solve any Integral equation Numerically...why not for the Prime counting function?...

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Integral involving Pi(x)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**