I ran into an integral while working on response of a signal processing filter, it looks like: [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^{2} e^{-x^{2}} dx [/tex] While trying integration by parts u = [tex]x^{2}[/tex] we get du = 2xdx but can't proceed with dv = [tex]e^{-x^{2}}[/tex] because then v = [tex]\int e^{-x^{2}}[/tex] can't be integrated unless we use the limits. Can anyone suggest an approach for this? Thanks, Niks
What exactly are you trying to do? As you point out, your v is not any elementary function, and that tells you that neither is [tex]\int x^2e^{-x^2} dx[/tex] You might be able to do that in terms of the "error function", Erf(x), which is defined to be [tex]\int e^{-x^2} dx[/tex]
If you just want to calculate the definite integral, I don't see why you wouldn't want to include the limits when integrating by parts?
His point, about the limits of integration, was that it is well known that [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{x^2}dx= 2\sqrt{\pi}[/itex] while the anti-derivative is not an elementary function. in other words, he could, theoretically, do it as a definite integral with the right limits but not as an indefinite integral.
Was that adressed to me? Anyway, Maple tells me that: [tex] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^{n} e^{-x^{2}}\rm{d} x=\frac{1}{2}\Gamma\left(\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(1+(-1)^n\right) [/tex] , which should be possible to prove by induction. PS. HallsofIvy: You have forgotten the minus-sign in your integrand.
A cute way to solve this is to recall that [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-ax^2}=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{\sqrt{a}}[/tex] Then use Feynman's favorite trick and differentiate both sides with respect to a, and evaluate at a = 1.
I think I should use this as a guideline for future problems. Both u and v should be elementary functions otherwise integration by parts becomes too messy(perhaps impossible). Yes, that was what I had in mind. That's why I got stuck there. Thanks!! That will help me move forward. Thanks to everyone who replied, I learnt a lot from this thread. -Niks
Using lots of substitutions and integration by parts I get this: [tex]\int x^{2}e^{-{x^2}}dx=xe^{x^{2}}\left[1-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\prod_{k=2}^{n}\left(2k-3\right)}{2^{n}x^{2n}}\right][/tex] I would go over the derivation but LaTex is killing me.
Quite frankly, I think using Leibniz' rule, as suggested by Nicksauce, would by far be the simplest method in this case.
Quite true. But, if doing by parts, then the proper selection of u an dv is [tex]u=x[/tex] [tex]dv= x*e^{-x^2}dx[/tex] and then things won't be so messy - however, it will involve the definite integral [itex]\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}{ e^{-{x^2}}dx}[/itex] which we know equals [itex]\sqrt{\pi}[/itex].
umm mathematica gives me [tex]\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}[/tex] and for the indefinite : [tex] \frac{1}{4} \sqrt{\pi } \text{erf}(x)-\frac{1}{2} e^{-x^2} x [/tex]
Well, perhaps the very simplest approach is to recognize that the integral is [itex]\sqrt{\pi}[/itex] times the variance of a Gaussian random variable with mean 0 and standard deviation [itex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]. That's certainly all I'd bother doing in the signal processing context the OP mentioned.