Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Integral of x^x. exists?

  1. Apr 5, 2006 #1
    Is there a solution for [tex]\int x^x dx[/tex], I wonder...
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 5, 2006 #2

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It is, but not in closed form. However, we're pretty sure that

    [tex]\int \left(ln x +1) x^{x} \ dx [/tex]

    exists in closed form...Even though neither of the 2 integrals involved in it exist in closed form.

    Daniel.
     
  4. Jul 2, 2010 #3
    This integral doesn't have a solution . Say will be great to know the solution of this integral :!!)
    Function x^x
    This function cannot be integrated.
    Most likely it's a nonelementary integral. from http://www.numberempire.com/integralcalculator.php.
     
  5. Jul 2, 2010 #4

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    1. Please, do not do paleontological research here at PF. This thread is 4 years old
    2. x^x is an integrable function, because it is continuous
     
  6. Jul 2, 2010 #5
    I am new here and can you give me this function ? I love it to see it .
     
  7. Jul 2, 2010 #6

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Indeed.
    It is called F(x), and can be represented as follows:
    [tex]F(x)=\int_{0}^{x}t^{t}dt+1[/tex]

    A number of other representations of it is possible, none of them in terms of a finite combination of elementary functions.
     
  8. Jul 3, 2010 #7
    I remember from my calc III course that there are some algorithms to determine if a given function's integral is expressible in terms of elementary function. Unfortunately I don't remember the details.
    Does someone know how to prove for a given function that it will never show up as a derivative of an elementary function?

    Of course, "elementary function" can be defined in different ways, but that's not my point.

    And sorry for hijacking the thread, this just came to my mind when I read your posts.
     
  9. Jul 3, 2010 #8
    Many functions which aren't "derivatives of elementary functions" (as commonly said) can be expressed in terms of an infinite series of elementary functions. But don't split hairs !
    Proving for a given function that it will never show up as a derivative of a FINITE number of elementary functions is a different ball game. It was done in some particular and limited cases, but not in general. Present mathematical theory in this field isn't advanced enough.
    For French speakers only : an essay on special functions, presented as a scientific review for general public, is avalable through the link :
    http://www.scribd.com/people/documents/10794575-jjacquelin
    Then, select the e-paper: "Safari au pays des fonctions spéciales"
    .
    By the way, an integral of x^x is knows as a special function, namely the "Sophomore's dream" function.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2010
  10. Jul 3, 2010 #9

    Gib Z

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    The Risch Algorithm is used to determine if an antiderivative can be evaluated in terms of elementary functions and if so, it evaluates them.

    Also, the "Sophomores Dream" usually refers to the result [tex]\int^1_0 \frac{1}{x^x} dx = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^n} [/tex] also sometimes it is used to refer to [tex]\int^1_0 x^x dx = - \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-n)^{-n}[/tex]. It never refers to a function.
     
  11. Jul 3, 2010 #10
    "Somophores dream" :
    :rofl: Well, if not, why not the "Masters dream function" ? :rofl:
     
  12. Aug 2, 2010 #11
  13. Sep 16, 2010 #12
  14. Dec 6, 2010 #13
    JJ, You seem to know a lot about this "int x^x" function - does it have poles or zeros on the complex plane? does it have the same branch cuts as x ln(x) (or ln(x)) ??
    That's the real importance of creating a new function ... to know the pole/zero/cut structure
    I am asking because integral(-inf,+inf) exp(-|w|/2) w^(i/pi w ln |w|+i w x) seems to have a pole at -pi^2/6... but I don't know why it would have a pole there...
     
  15. Dec 7, 2010 #14
    In fact, I don't know a lot about this "int x^x" function, as it is written : "My own contribution will here appear so modest in the light of all that still remains to be done", page 3 in the paper "The Sophomores Dream Function",
    http://www.scribd.com/JJacquelin/documents
    Especially, the section 11 Complex arguments, is quite empty. Study was not advanced enough. Only in case of more available results they could be added in a new edition. Moreover, I expect that more publications will be made by other authors in order to increase the background. As it is written "it will depend on many contributors".
    The question is interesting. Unfortunately I am not sure to correctly read the integral. I suppose that dw is missing. Also w^(i/pi w ln |w|+i w x) looks confusing for me. Would you like rewrite the whole integral more clearly ?
     
  16. Dec 7, 2010 #15
    Hi! JJ,
    The integral I am seeking to evaluate is

    int_{-\inf}^{+\inf) exp(-|w|/2) exp( i w [ln(|w|)/pi-x]) dw

    a definite integral which is a function of x...

    I don't know why, but this function seems to have a singularity at -pi^2/6

    This does have a physical application: it would be the minimum phase impulse
    response of a cable having losses linear with frequency,,,
     
  17. Dec 7, 2010 #16

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Since this has no relation to the integral of [itex]x^x[/itex] I recommend you start a new thread rather than add onto this one.
     
  18. Dec 7, 2010 #17
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Integral of x^x. exists?
  1. Integral of e^x/x (Replies: 15)

  2. Integral of y=x^x (Replies: 4)

  3. Integral sin(x)/x (Replies: 2)

Loading...