Is the Integration of xex Correctly Solved?

  • Thread starter ƒ(x)
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integral
In summary, the function f(x) is not equal to the function g(x) when g'(x)f(x)^{g(x)-1} is not equal to g'(x)f(x)^{g(x).
  • #1
ƒ(x)
328
0
Please forgive any formatting errors.

[tex]\int x[/tex]exdx = ?

Is this correct?

[tex]\int x[/tex]exdx

= [tex]\int e[/tex]ln(x)exdx
= [tex]\int e[/tex]exln(x)dx

u = ex
x = ln(u)
du = exdx
[tex]du/u[/tex] = dx

= ∫ ln(u)u*(1/u)*du

a = ln(u)u
EDIT: da = ln(u)u-1du
dv = 1/u du
v = ln(u)

= ln(u)u+1 - ∫ [ln(u)]udu

u = ex

= ln(ex)ex+1 - ∫ [ln(ex)]exdx

∫xexdx = xex+1-∫xexdx

2∫xexdx = xex+1
∫xexdx = xex+1*(1/2)+C
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ƒ(x) said:
a = ln(u)u
da = ln(u)u-1

:eek: eeks, that's not really how you differentiate that function is it?
∫xexdx = xex+1*(1/2)+C

Have you tried differentiating this result?

More to the point, does this integral actually exist/converge for all values of x?...Surely you are given integration limits?
 
  • #3
gabbagabbahey said:
:eek: eeks, that's not really how you differentiate that function is it?

Well...I skipped some steps.

a = ln(u)^u
a = 1/u (chain rule) * u (bring down the exponent) * ln(u)^u-1 (subtract from the exponent)
a = ln(u)^(u-1) (simplify)
 
  • #4
You can't do that when the exponent is the variable.
 
  • #5
Unknot said:
You can't do that when the exponent is the variable.

Oh...Hm...what would you do then?
 
  • #6
make the function e^(something). Then you can use chain rule.
 
  • #7
Again, there is an even bigger issue here than you incorrectly differentiating 'a':

gabbagabbahey said:
More to the point, does this integral actually exist/converge for all values of x?...Surely you are given integration limits?

To illustrate the problem, I've plotted the integrand for x=[0,3]:

http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/2144/hmmmp.th.jpg

Does it look as though the area under the curve is bounded?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
Unknot said:
You can't do that when the exponent is the variable.

Wait...what's wrong with the way I did it? I'm differentiating with respect to u.
 
  • #9
(d/dx)3^x is not x3^(x-1).
 
  • #10
what is the integral of x^(e^x) then?
 
  • #11
I really doubt you can integrate it indefinitely.
 
  • #12
ƒ(x) said:
what is the integral of x^(e^x) then?

It is unreasonable to expect an antiderivative to exist, when the area under the curve of the integrand becomes unbounded at around x=5!...That means for almost half of the real number line, the integral does not exist.

There is no antiderivative for this function, but if you are given specific integration limits, and the integral is bounded on that interval, you may still be able to evaluate analytically by using a trick or two, and if that fails numerical integration is always available.

So, I ask for the 3rd time; Are you given limits of integration?
 
  • #13
ƒ(x) said:
Wait...what's wrong with the way I did it? I'm differentiating with respect to u.

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} f(x)^{g(x)}= \frac{d}{dx} e^{\ln(f(x)^{g(x)})}=\frac{d}{dx} e^{g(x)\ln(f(x))}=e^{g(x)\ln(f(x))}\left(g'(x)\ln(f(x))+\frac{g(x)}{f(x)}f'(x)\right)[/tex]

[tex]=f(x)^{g(x)}\left(g'(x)\ln(f(x))+\frac{g(x)}{f(x)}f'(x)\right)\neq g'(x)f(x)^{g(x)-1}[/tex]
 

What is the formula for ∫xexdx?

The formula for ∫xexdx is xex+1/2 + C, where C is the constant of integration.

What does ∫xexdx represent?

∫xexdx represents the indefinite integral of the function xex.

How do you solve ∫xexdx?

To solve ∫xexdx, you can use the power rule for integration, which states that the integral of xn is equal to xn+1/n+1, where n is any real number. In this case, n is equal to 1, so the integral becomes x1+1/1+1 = x2/2. Then, you can use the chain rule to multiply the result by the derivative of the inner function, which in this case is ex. Therefore, the final answer is xex+1/2 + C.

What is the purpose of the constant of integration in ∫xexdx?

The constant of integration, represented by the letter C, is added to the result of the integral to account for all possible antiderivatives of the function xex. This is because when taking the derivative of a constant, it becomes 0. Therefore, the constant of integration allows for different antiderivatives to be included in the solution.

Can ∫xexdx be solved using other methods?

Yes, ∫xexdx can also be solved using integration by parts or substitution, depending on the complexity of the function. However, the power rule for integration is the most straightforward and efficient method for solving this particular integral.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
812
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
728
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
201
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
775
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
571
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
754
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top