1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Integrating charge density

  1. Aug 25, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data Find the electric charge centred in a sphere of radius a, centered at the origin where the electric potential is found to be (in spherical coordinates) [itex] V(r)=kr^-2 [/itex] where k is some constant.

    3. The attempt at a solution

    We have [itex] E=-\nabla V = -2kr^{-3} \hat{r} [/itex]
    So applying Guass's law to the sphere of radius a, we get
    [itex] \oint_s E \cdot da = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0} [/itex]
    And thus [itex] Q= \frac{-8\pi k \epsilon_0}{a} [/itex]

    My problem is, surely the same result should be obtained by taking the triple integral of the charge density with respect to volume, but pursuing this path...
    [tex] \rho=-\epsilon_0 \nabla^2 V(r) = -\epsilon_0 2kr^{-4} [/tex]
    Attempting to integrate this in spherical coordinates results in,
    [tex]Q= \iiint_V \rho dV = -8\pi \epsilon_0 k \int_0^a r^{-2} dr [/tex]
    but due to the singularity this tends to infinity. Where did I take a wrong step?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 25, 2012 #2

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi T-chef! :smile:
    Nooo … ∂/∂x 1/(x2 + y2 + z2) = … ? :wink:
     
  4. Aug 25, 2012 #3
    Hello Tiny Tim!
    I was hoping by working in spherical coordinates I could make my life easier. My book assures me here grad is given by
    [tex] \nabla t = \frac{\partial t}{\partial r}\hat{r} + \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial t}{\partial \theta}\hat{\theta}+\frac{1}{rsin(\theta)}\frac{\partial t}{\partial\phi}\hat{\phi} [/tex]
    So since V is independent of the angles, their partial derivatives vanish leaving me with just the first term. Have I misinterpreted working with grad in other coordinates systems?
     
  5. Aug 25, 2012 #4
    i think the potential for V is only the potential outside the sphere. inside the sphere the potential is affected by the charge distributions themselves
    also the laplacian of the potential is NOT equivalent to taking the gradient twice, check the math and i think u will see something that looks like a dirac delta function
     
  6. Aug 25, 2012 #5
    I used the Laplacian as expressed in spherical coordinates, which i certainly agree, is not taking grad twice :smile:
    That said, I suppose I could have used:
    [tex] E=-2kr^{-3} \hat{r} [/tex]
    so:
    [tex] \nabla \cdot E = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} [/tex]
    [tex] \rho = \epsilon_0 \nabla \cdot (-2kr^{-3} \hat{r}) [/tex]
    Now in my (very limited!) knowledge of delta functions, don't I need to be applying divergence to a [itex] \frac{\bf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} [/itex] term to introduce a delta function, rather than the -3 power I've found myself with?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Integrating charge density
  1. Charge density (Replies: 6)

  2. Charge Density (Replies: 3)

  3. Charge density (Replies: 14)

  4. Charge density (Replies: 5)

Loading...