Integration by Parts: \int{\sin{(\theta)}*\cos{(\theta)}*d\theta}

In summary: Let u = sin(theta), then du = cos(theta) d(theta), and you are left with\int{u*dv} = u*v - \int{v*du}= sin(theta)*sin(theta) - \int{sin(theta)*cos(theta) * cos(theta)*d(theta)}= sin^2(theta) - \int{sin(theta)*cos(theta)*d(theta)}Now use the identity sin(2*theta) = 2*sin(theta)*cos(theta) to rewrite the integral on the right-hand side as\int{sin(theta)*cos(theta)*d(theta)} = \frac{1}{2} \int{sin(2*theta) * d(theta)}= \frac{1
  • #1
Philosophaie
462
0
The Integral:
[tex]\int{\sin{(\theta)}*\cos{(\theta)}*d\theta}[/tex]
Attempt to solve by Integration by Parts:
[tex]\int{u*dv} = u*v - \int{v*du}[/tex]
[tex]u = \sin{(\theta)}[/tex]
[tex]du = \cos{(\theta)}*d\theta[/tex]
[tex]v = \sin{(\theta)}[/tex]
[tex]dv = \cos{(\theta)}*d\theta[/tex]
Bringing back to the beginning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Have you considered using the ##sin(2\theta) = 2 sin(\theta) cos(\theta)## identity or do you need to use parts?

Also what if you add ##udv + vdu## integrals together to be = ## u . v ##?
 
  • #3
In fact, I wouldn't use the that identity! Since [itex](sin(\theta)'= cos(\theta)[/itex], the substitution [itex]u= sin(\theta)[/itex] so [itex]du= cos(\theta)d\theta[/itex] gives [itex]\int sin(\theta)cos(\theta) d\theta= \int u du= \frac{1}{2}u^2+ C[/itex].

But you can do this "by parts" using [itex]u= sin(\theta)[/itex], [itex]dv= cos(\theta)d\theta[/itex] as you suggest. [itex]du= cos(\theta)d\theta[/itex] and [itex]v= sin(\theta)d\theta[/itex] so the integral becomes [itex]\int sin(\theta)cos(\theta)d\theta= sin^2(\theta)- \int sin(\theta) cos(\theta) d\theta[/itex].

Now, that is NOT "back to the beginning" because we can add [itex]\int sin(\theta)cos(\theta) d\theta[/itex] to both sides to gbet [itex]2 \int sin(\theta)cos(\theta)d\theta= sin^2(\theta)[/itex] and dividing both sides by 2 gives the previous result.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes PWiz
  • #4
HallsofIvy has made a good point. Always write down the LHS and the RHS of the equation while integrating by parts when you're dealing with functions which are related to their first few derivatives with a constant (chiefly exponential and trigonometric functions).
 
  • #5
What HallsOfIvy and PWiz are talking about is using integration by parts and algebraically solving for an integral. Here's an example.
##\int e^x \cos x dx## -- int. by parts, with ##u = e^x, dv = \cos x dx##, so ##du = e^x, v = \sin x##
##= e^x \sin x - \int e^x \sin x dx## -- int. by parts again, with ##u = e^x, dv = -\sin x dx## and ##du = e^x dx, v = \cos x##
##= e^x \sin x + e^x \cos x - \int e^x \cos x dx##

It looks like we've come full circle here, but actually we haven't. The above shows that
##\int e^x \cos x dx = e^x \sin x + e^x \cos x - \int e^x \cos x dx##
Add ##\int e^x \cos x dx## to both sides of the equation above, and solve algebraically for this integral. Of course, you need to add the arbitrary constant in your final answer.
 
  • #6
You don't need to use integration by parts. Try a simple u-substitution.
 

What is Integration by Parts?

Integration by Parts is a method of solving indefinite integrals that involves breaking down the integrand into two separate parts and using the product rule to solve for the integral.

How do you use Integration by Parts?

To use Integration by Parts, you need to identify the parts of the integrand that can be differentiated and integrated. Then, you can use the formula ∫u*dv = uv - ∫v*du to solve for the integral.

What is the formula for Integration by Parts?

The formula for Integration by Parts is ∫u*dv = uv - ∫v*du, where u and v are the parts of the integrand that can be differentiated and integrated, respectively.

Can Integration by Parts be used for definite integrals?

Yes, Integration by Parts can be used for definite integrals, but it requires some additional steps. You would need to use the formula ∫a^b u(x)*v'(x) dx = [u(x)*v(x)]|a^b - ∫a^b v(x)*u'(x) dx to solve for the definite integral.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when using Integration by Parts?

One common mistake is using the wrong order of integration, which can lead to incorrect results. Another mistake is not paying attention to the signs of the parts of the integrand, which can also result in incorrect solutions.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
288
Replies
8
Views
175
Replies
2
Views
930
Replies
4
Views
347
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top