Okay I've seen how crazy Riemann sums can get in real analysis and I've noticed a heirarchy of notation.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The Stewart/Thomas etc... kinds of books use;

[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n} f(x_i) \Delta x[/tex]

Where;

[tex]\Delta x = \frac{b - a}{n} and x_i = a + i\Delta x[/tex]

Then the books like Apostol and Bartle's real analysis use;

[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n} f(x_i) (x_i - x_i_-_1)[/tex]

and what I'd like to know is how to calculate the (x_i - x_i_-_1) for some equation like;

f(x) = x² integrated from 2 to 8. I can do the Δx = (b - a)/n version fine but how do you work the newer notation?

in f(x_i) (x_i - x_i_-_1) I would assume f(x_i) would use any endpoint, i.e. the right endpoint being a + iΔx but how do you make sense of the (x_i - x_i_-_1)???

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Integration Summation Notation

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**