Has anyone rebutted E. Lester Smith's Intelligence Came First theory?

In summary, the conversation is about a book called "Intelligence Came First" by E. Lester Smith, which argues for the idea of intelligent design on a universal scale and challenges the traditional belief that thought originates from the physical brain. The book has been subject to rebuttals and has been deemed as "crackpottery" by some.
  • #1
asterias
8
0
Hey guys ..

I would like to know if anyone has gone through, "Intelligence Came First" by E. Lester Smith. He make some nice points.

Have their been any rebuttals to His conclusions ?

`a
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Which were?

Garth
 
  • #3
It's an intelligent design arguement... on a Universal scale.. It is common among ID proponents to argue against evolution using cosmological arguments.

Here is the premise: Throughout evolution function has proceded the organ through which it is to be exercised; the organ developed in response to a need. So why should the brain be any exception? In other words INTELLIGENCE CAME FIRST, quite able to function in its own realm. Working from such a premise it is no wonder that this daring group of scientists has opened up a Pandora's box of controversy. Are life, intelligence, and consciousness the primal realities? And is their expression in biological forms on Earth a secondary event? Is this scientific heresy? The authors suggest that it is somewhat ridiculous to maintain the position of a mechanistic, chance creation which insists that thought originates and depends upon the physical brain. This book has been written for both the scintist and the layman and includes some very real experimental situations. Suggest the authors: "Speaking of the brain ... no special 'box' equivalent to the computer's 'memory store' has been identified; nor is memory to be found in a particular cell, synapse, or chemical molecule." "Searching for memory traces is like looking for the difference between jazz and symphonic music by studying the humps on a phonograph record." "All experience is not stored in the brain."
--- from book's back cover

https://www.amazon.com/review/product/083560456X/ref=_dp_top?%5Fencoding=UTF8&showViewpoints=1&tag=pfamazon01-20

To the OP, yes. This book is out of print. The argument has advanced a lot since and the premise has been rebutted in every detail. Read the transcripts from Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District and search and watch the youtube videos by Ken Miller. The notion of functionality that supposedly arose before function is dealt with in detail. If you want more after that answer Garth (if the thread don't get locked first).
 
  • #4
Sorry, ID is just crackpottery.
 

1. What is the theory of "Intelligence Came First"?

The theory of "Intelligence Came First" suggests that intelligence was the first trait to evolve in humans and was the driving force behind the development of other traits and abilities.

2. What evidence supports the theory of "Intelligence Came First"?

There is evidence from fossil records and comparative studies that shows the gradual increase in brain size and complexity in humans and other species. This supports the idea that intelligence was the first trait to evolve and has continued to shape the evolution of other traits.

3. How does the theory of "Intelligence Came First" explain human evolution?

The theory suggests that the development of intelligence allowed humans to adapt and thrive in their environment, leading to the development of other traits such as language, tool use, and social behaviors.

4. Is the theory of "Intelligence Came First" widely accepted in the scientific community?

The theory is still a topic of debate and is not universally accepted in the scientific community. While there is evidence to support the idea, there are also other theories that suggest different factors played a role in human evolution.

5. How does the theory of "Intelligence Came First" impact our understanding of human intelligence?

The theory challenges the idea that intelligence is solely a product of our environment and highlights the importance of our evolutionary history in shaping our cognitive abilities. It also raises questions about the potential for further development and enhancement of human intelligence in the future.

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
811
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
506
Back
Top