Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Interaction representation

  1. Sep 9, 2007 #1
    Hi,

    Can someone explain to me why do we actually need the Interaction/Intermediate representation?
    In my past, each course in QM touched it only for a few minutes and then it got... forgotten.

    Can someone please give me an example as to how (and when) it is used (and a good reason why)?

    Thanks!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 10, 2007 #2
    the interaction picture is useful because it's decomposition of the hamiltonian allows for time-dependent perturbation methods
     
  4. Sep 10, 2007 #3

    f95toli

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    We don't really "need" the interaction picture, but it is very convenient sometimes.
    The interaction picture is a representation which is somewhere in-between the Schrödinger and the Heisenberg picture. Note, however, that you can easily move between all of these representations using unitary transformations.

    I think the word "picture" is somewhat missleading. Today there is no "philosophical" reason why you choose one over the other, you use whichever one s the most convenient for the problem you are trying to do. Moving between pictures is therefore somewhat akin to e.g. moving between coordinate-systems in classical mechanics.

    A good example would be a driven Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian on resonance (being driven at some frequency [tex]$\omega_l=\omega_0=\omega_r$, where $\omega_0, \omega_r$ [/tex] are the splitting of the 2-level system and the resonance frequency of the resonator, respectively).
    Moving to the interaction picture here essentially means that you are solving your problem in a 'rotating coordinate system' which simplifies the problem A LOT since all but two terms become zero and the time dependence dissapears.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Interaction representation
  1. Representation of QM (Replies: 1)

  2. Spinor representations (Replies: 1)

Loading...