- #1
LouisR
- 1
- 0
I have some problems with what a prof. asked us in class. This is a class of analysis that is dealing with measure theory and stuff like Fourrier transform:
I am really stuck with the following ( really have problem to explain the steps rigorously ):
(d/dy){g(x,y)} means differentiates(partially) g with respect to y
i is the usual square root of -1
1-) For this one, x is in R^n, y is in R, f(x) is a Schwarz function ( or if you prefer in the Schwarz class, so as consequence, f is integrable over R^n and it is infinitely differentiable). Could anyone gives me the rigorous steps for this please:
integral( (d/dy){e^(-i*x*y)*f(x) dx} ) = (d/dy){integral(e^(-i*x*y)*f(x) dx)}
2-)Here is a simpler case: Let [a,b] be a close interval in the real. Integration is from a to b. Suppose that f(x,y) and (d/dx){f(x,y)} are continuous on R^2. Then again what are the rigorous justifications for this:
(d/dy){integral(f(x,y)dx)} = integral((d/dy){f(x,y)dx})
A really big thanks in advance if anybody could explain me this.
I am really stuck with the following ( really have problem to explain the steps rigorously ):
(d/dy){g(x,y)} means differentiates(partially) g with respect to y
i is the usual square root of -1
1-) For this one, x is in R^n, y is in R, f(x) is a Schwarz function ( or if you prefer in the Schwarz class, so as consequence, f is integrable over R^n and it is infinitely differentiable). Could anyone gives me the rigorous steps for this please:
integral( (d/dy){e^(-i*x*y)*f(x) dx} ) = (d/dy){integral(e^(-i*x*y)*f(x) dx)}
2-)Here is a simpler case: Let [a,b] be a close interval in the real. Integration is from a to b. Suppose that f(x,y) and (d/dx){f(x,y)} are continuous on R^2. Then again what are the rigorous justifications for this:
(d/dy){integral(f(x,y)dx)} = integral((d/dy){f(x,y)dx})
A really big thanks in advance if anybody could explain me this.